
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 781
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 220 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Has life gotten better for you since Trump took office? Have costs gone down?
No.
That’s why Trump wants to shut down the government. That’s why Republicans refuse to negotiate. What they’re doing isn’t working, and they want hardworking Americans to pay the price.
Republicans control the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives. Trump wants to use his shutdown to fire MORE federal workers.
When people show you who they are, believe them.
I was so proud to join the Raising the Bar Conference to celebrate Workforce Development Month.
I repeated the wise words of Martin Luther King Jr., "Whenever you are engaged in work that serves humanity and is for the building of humanity, it has dignity, and it has worth."
I was honored to join the White Rose Foundation Inc. for the ribbon cutting of their new service center.
The White Rose Foundation Inc. continues to keep our community healthy, advocate for the elimination of health disparities, and protect our seniors and their health.
The Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) is a world leader in agricultural research, a model of American exceptionalism, and a standard we can’t afford to lose.
The Trump Admin's attempt to close BARC is misguided and wrong. Team Maryland is committed to saving BARC.
This weekend, Comptroller Lierman, Councilwoman Porter, and I heard from scientific researchers about just how dire their situation is thanks to RFK Jr.
The cuts this Admin has made on things like cancer and Alzheimer’s research will have consequences for decades to come.
Once again, President Trump and RFK Jr. are abandoning science, spreading conspiracy theories, and betraying American families – especially mothers.
For the sake of the American people’s health and future, RFK Jr. must resign or be fired immediately.
Shanah Tovah! To our Jewish community here in Maryland – and all across the world – I am wishing you a very sweet new year and many blessings as you celebrate with family and friends.
It was such a joy to gather Maryland’s Divine Nine leaders for a night of purpose and unity. Thank you to Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester and Congressman Bobby Scott for joining.
In these challenging times, we continue to come together to lead, fight for justice, and spread joy.
It was an honor to be at Howard University to kick off this year’s Gwendolyn S. and Colbert I. King speaker series.
To the students: You hold the potential to change this society in impressive ways. Don’t allow the letdowns of others distract or disillusion you.
Having our government sanction the media and everything that we say is a full on five alarm fire.
The freedom of speech is sacrosanct.
It’s not partisan. It’s American.
Changing the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War could cost taxpayers over a billion dollars.
I introduced a bill that would require those dollars to come out of Secretary Hegseth's travel budget.
Taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook for vanity projects.
I need my Republican colleagues to do more than express concerns about RFK Jr.
Children dying of measles is not a partisan issue.
We have to act to save our children’s lives.
Thank you Lupita Nyong’o and Mandy Moore for your advocacy.
We have become so used to telling our daughters to live through pain – it needs to stop. It's time to pass my bipartisan U-FIGHT Act to ensure more research dollars can go to studying fibroids.
I was so honored to speak at the investiture of Judge Stacey Cobb Smith and celebrate her appointment as Associate Judge of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County.
Prince George’s and Maryland are better off for her service.
I loved meeting with the Transportation Association of Maryland!
As Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee, I'm working to create transit options that work for Maryland and modernize our infrastructure.
Join me in praying for the students and staff of the U.S. Naval Academy who experienced last night’s lockdown. I’m grateful to hear the Midshipman who was injured is now in stable condition.
Thank you to our first responders who acted quickly to keep our Naval Academy safe.
24 years ago, our lives changed forever when terrorists struck the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.
Today, we remember the sweet memories of the Marylanders and Americans we lost and continue to thank our courageous first responders who risked it all in service to their country.
Our democracy depends on us being able to disagree in peace – there is no room in this country for political violence.
No American should be at a grocery store, church, school, or political rally and fear being shot. This is not who we are.
Praying for Charlie's loved ones.
If RFK were serious about keeping our children safe, he'd stop spreading vaccine conspiracy theories.
He'd stop insinuating that pregnant mothers who take Tylenol are harming their children.
RFK Jr. is dangerous. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/09/w...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History781 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
781 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.