My father is the smartest man I know. I am where I am today thanks to his guidance.
Happy Father’s Day to my dad and to all the dads and father figures in Maryland.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 222 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Happy Pride!
I was so honored to lead Baltimore’s 50th Pride Parade as Grand Marshal and celebrate with our community in love and appreciation for our LGBTQ neighbors.
We must never lose sight that everyone deserves the freedom to be who they are and love who they love.
I thank Omar Karim, the Governor, state delegation, and local leaders for continuing to move this project forward.
I joined the groundbreaking for Park Place at Addison Road Metro continuing our vision for the Blue Line Corridor.
I’m proud to have supported Banneker Ventures as they developed the vision for the first Class A multifamily and retail project to come to Capitol Heights.
While Republicans seem hellbent on kicking as many people off their health insurance as possible, we will fight tooth and nail to expand coverage and to ensure that every American, every child in particular, has access to the care they need.
Deamonte was only 12-years-old.
Senator Cardin worked tirelessly throughout his career to make sure that no child should ever suffer Deamonte’s fate.
Every child, every family, deserves access to quality, affordable dental care. Access is literally a matter of life and death.
I introduced the Medicare and Medicaid Dental, Vision, & Hearing Benefit Act.
This legislation is personal to me. 18 years ago, a young Marylander named Deamonte Driver died of complications from a tooth infection because his family was kicked off of Medicaid. www.baltimoresun.com/2025/06/12/m...
The date is June 12, 2025.
The location is Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
A U.S. Senator who questioned this President's actions was forcibly thrown to the ground by armed officers.
This is the America Trump always wanted. It’s up to us to save our country.
115 Fair Housing cases have been terminated.
Why were they terminated?
I asked Craig Trainor, Trump’s nominee for Assistant Secretary Designate for the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for a commitment to answer that question.
Listen to his non-answer⬇️
RFK’s new panel of vaccine experts at CDC are a bunch of anti vax conspiracy theorists.
It was a joy to join Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. – Alpha Leadership Academy. This program equips collegiate young men to lead with purpose, integrity, and service.
I encouraged them to have a voice in national affairs.
They made me hopeful for our future.
It was a joy to join Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. – Alpha Leadership Academy. This program equips collegiate young men to lead with purpose, integrity, and service.
I encouraged them to have a voice in national affairs.
They made me hopeful for our future.
None of this is happening in a vacuum.
Firing 17 vaccine experts.
Lying about scientific studies.
Cutting funds for vaccine research.
RFK is pushing an anti-vaccine agenda onto the American people. This will cost lives. www.notus.org/health-scien...
The constant lies
The $15 million in cancer funding cut
The $9.5 billion in NIH grants terminated
The 20,000 jobs eliminated
The quackery
The conspiracy theories
I don’t know where to start on why RFK MUST RESIGN.
I stand with the brave NIH workers who continue to advocate for science and research in the face of this backwards-thinking Administration. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/h...
I was honored to speak at Duke University’s Executive Master of Public Affairs reception.
My time at Duke ignited a passion for service and love of public policy. And it was at Duke where I started to hear the call to serve.
I hope the students I spoke with hear that call too.
In Western Maryland:
1 in 7 adults relies on Medicaid.
1 in 3 children relies on the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Republicans want to cut these lifesaving programs to pay for billionaire tax cuts. It's disgraceful. www.baltimoresun.com/2025/06/09/r...
I visited Marylanders at Collington senior community.
Nearly every one of them told me how this Republican scam of a bill would hurt them.
Kicking Marylanders off their health care is utterly callous.
I'll always fight to protect Medicare and Medicaid.
Grateful to Luminis Health, Employ Prince George’s, and all our partners for co-hosting a job and resource fair for Marylanders who have been impacted by layoffs and those seeking new opportunities.
We had employers from across MD. During this time, we need to come together.
Eid Mubarak to everyone in Maryland and across the globe!
I wish you peace, joy, and many blessings as you gather today with your families and loved ones.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History782 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
782 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.