Thank you to the nearly 13,000 of you who joined my telephone town hall last night to talk about the looming shutdown and Trump’s attempt to take over Portland.
I’m in DC fighting for you – thank you for being in this fight with me.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 5
Janelle S. Bynum
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align96%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Janelle S. Bynum
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 5
SoupScore
Janelle S.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 92 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We didn't ask for Trump's intervention, and we don't need it.
What our city actually needs is for him to run us our money.
🚨TELEPHONE TOWN HALL TODAY 🚨
This evening at 5:30PM PT, I’ll be hosting an open-to-all telephone town hall to talk all things shutdown and Trump’s attempted takeover of Portland.
If you’d like to listen in, you can visit my website: bynum.house.gov/TTH
We need to reverse the healthcare cuts and start making real progress on lowering costs, but it’s clear that Republicans have no interest in doing that.
Instead, they’re shutting down the government.
I didn’t stutter: there will be no federal takeover of Portland.
Republicans are acting like they don’t control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency – they do.
If they can’t get their act together to avoid a shutdown, it’s on them.
My heart goes out to the families impacted by the shooting in Michigan today.
Everybody should feel safe from the threat of gun violence in their place of worship.
Trump has taken away money for projects across Oregon and given it to billionaires.
If he actually wants to do something for us, he can run us our money.
Nobody asked for this. We don't need or want troops in our city, Mr. President.
Reposted byRep. Janelle Bynum
Oregon Rep. @bynum.house.gov calls President Trump’s threat to use military force in Portland “little boy energy” and says, “the last time Trump sent his goons to town, we ran them out....He knows he lost, and he wants to come back.”
Stay out of my city. You want to do something? Run us our money.
A lack of staff at the VA has led to gaps in care and unrealistic wait times for benefit applications.
@reptedlieu.bsky.social and I are pushing for answers on how this administration plans to make sure our veterans get the care they’ve earned and deserve.
Oregonians are being left behind by House Republicans, who would rather let the government shut down than reverse the cuts they made to healthcare.
I won’t stand for it.
To keep up to date with what I’m working on both in Washington and in CD5, be sure you’re subscribed to my newsletter!
🔗 Sign up here: bynum.house.gov/subscribe
Republicans have just 5️⃣ days left to avoid a government shutdown.
I’m ready to get back to work and get it done for Oregonians – just waiting on you, SpeakerJohnson!
The VA has lost thousands of healthcare professionals since Trump took office.
@reptedlieu.bsky.social and I are demanding answers – our veterans deserve access to any and all care they need.
Oregonians have told me time and time again they want lower costs and their healthcare protected.
Republicans are ignoring their wishes to put billionaires first – I won't help them do it.
www.opb.org/article/2025...
Republicans can play the blame game all they want, but if the government shuts down, it’s on them.
The Food Hub at Clackamas Service Center is playing a huge role in helping our neighbors in need, especially after the cuts to SNAP in Republicans’ trash budget.
Learn more ⬇️
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.