At a Glance

Seat

Representative for Texas District 16

Born

September 15, 1969

Age 57

Phone

(202) 225-4831

Office

2448 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 16

Veronica Escobar

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 617

Yes42%

No56%

Present0%

Not Voting2%

Party align98%

Cross-party0%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 16

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Bluesky Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Veronica Escobar

U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 16

SoupScore

Veronica's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 76 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

It’s time Congress finally addresses our broken system in a fair, orderly way that’ll benefit our country - immigrants and Americans alike. There hasn’t been a more urgent time to do so.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

4. Finally, the visa reform section addresses long ignored backlogs to ensure our country remains competitive.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

It also ensures that asylum seekers have guaranteed access to legal counsel as they go through the asylum process.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

Our asylum reform section establishes 3 regional processing centers across Latin America so that immigrants can legally seek asylum without making the dangerous trek through the western hemisphere to the United States.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

3. Under current law, the only way to claim asylum is to declare your intention to seek asylum at the border.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

It updates their training and provides new guidelines, such as making it unlawful to carry out immigration enforcement actions in places like schools, hospitals, places of worship, courthouses, and more.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

2. The border security section has funding for border infrastructure and equipment, as well as CBP agents and officers.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

1. Eligible undocumented immigrants could enroll in our newly created Dignity Program that would grant legal status, work and travel authorities, as well as protections in this permanently renewable status.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

Our legislation can be broken up into four sections: legal status and protections for undocumented immigrants, border security, asylum reform, and visa reform.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

We first introduced the Dignity Act last Congress. Back then, Democrats controlled the Senate and the White House. As we find ourselves in a Republican trifecta, changes were made to the bill to reflect this new political reality and address some of the issues we’ve seen since then.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

Together with Congresswoman Maria Salazar and a group of our Democratic and Republican colleagues, we’re trying to address an issue Congress has ignored for so long.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 15(source)

Our immigration system is broken and hasn’t been meaningfully updated in decades. That’s why today I introduced a comprehensive, bipartisan immigration reform bill known as the Dignity Act. escobar.house.gov/news/documen...

Representatives Escobar, Salazar Reintroduce the Dignity Act

After more than two years of negotiation, there is an updated compromise that addresses legal status and protections for undocumented immigrants, border security, asylum reform, and visa reform.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 14(source)

Last night, I shared some exciting news on ABC7 Xtra: tomorrow, I'll be introducing my bipartisan immigration reform bill, the Dignity Act, in Congress.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 11(source)

Plus, the Department led by a Secretary best known for cosplaying that she’s in a war zone should perhaps not lecture anyone on publicity stunts.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 11(source)

I have every intention of continuing my oversight responsibilities and fighting back against the lawlessness of this administration every chance I get.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 11(source)

I would have preferred to quietly conduct my oversight responsibilities as I always have, but ICE chose not to follow the law. These ‘guidelines’ are illegal, and that deserves public scrutiny.

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 11(source)

ICE responded informing me and my staff about their new procedures - we informed them of the law.

Good afternoon,

Unfortunately, we’re unable to support a visit to the El Paso facility on 7/9/25. The Department is now requiring requests be made seven (7) calendar days in advance for scheduling. Please let us know whether we can help you schedule a future visit.

Statement attributable to DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin:

“As ICE law enforcement have seen a surge in assaults, disruptions, and obstructions to enforcement, including by politicians themselves, any requests to tour processing centers and field offices must be approved by the Secretary of Homeland Security. These requests must be part of legitimate congressional oversight activities.

As for visits to detention facilities, requests should be made with sufficient time to prevent interference with the President’s Article II authority to oversee executive department functions—a week is sufficient to ensure no intrusion on the President’s constitutional authority. To protect the President’s Article II authority, any request to shorten that time must be approved by the Secretary.”

As Department guidance regarding visits to DHS facilities is updated, it will be posted to ice.gov.

ICE continues to comply with Sec. 527 but entry into detention facilities may be delayed due to exigent circumstances (including personnel and facility security considerations during protests) or time required to vet requests to ensure they are for legitimate purposes (i.e., oversight, etc.). ICE will continue to take all actions required to faithfully execute Executive Order 14159, Protecting The American People Against Invasion; we defer additional questions regarding visits to DHS facilities, including questions regarding statements by Secretary Noem or Assistant Secretary McLaughlin, to the Department.

Let us know whether you have questions or need additional information.

Regards,

Thanks for your response. Below is section 527 as you noted. As you can see, there is no language in the text that allows ICE to delay oversight performed by a member of Congress for any length of time based on exigent circumstances or time required to vet a request. Our office has a longstanding working relationship with local DHS and ICE entities and we would hope to continue that relationship. As a member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, the Congresswoman looks forward to visiting the facility tomorrow and asking questions to relevant staff.

(a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Homeland Security by this Act may be used to prevent any of the following persons from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens, or to make any temporary modification at any such facility that in any way alters what is observed by a visiting Member of Congress or such designated employee, compared to what would be observed in the absence of such modification:
(1) A Member of Congress.
(2) An employee of the United States House of Representatives or the United States Senate designated by such a Member for the purposes of this section.

(b) Nothing in this section may be construed to require a Member of Congress to provide prior notice of the intent to enter a facility described in subsection (a) for the purpose of conducting oversight.

(c) With respect to individuals described in subsection (a)(2), the Department of Homeland Security may require that a request be made at least 24 hours in advance of an intent to enter a facility described in subsection (a).

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 11(source)

On Tuesday morning, my staff notified ICE of my intention to conduct oversight at the Montana Ave facility the next day. This is the process we have gone through innumerable times since I was elected, through both the Trump and Biden admins, including less than a month ago.

Congresswoman Escobar plans to visit the El Paso SPC at 8915 Montana Ave tomorrow afternoon around 2:45 pm MT.

I will be the only staff member accompanying her.

She’s visited the facility before, but it’s been at least a few years since she was there.

I know she will have questions about current statistics for all the El Paso ICE facilities, as well as the status on the additional facility expected to come into service later this month.

Please let me know if you need any further information.

Best,

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 11(source)

This week, ICE illegally denied me entry into a processing facility in my district, and today, they released a statement saying I “[gave] the appearance of a political stunt intended to generate publicity rather than pursue genuine oversight.” I have some thoughts.🧵

Rep. Veronica Escobar@repescobar.bsky.socialJul 9(source)

The Trump administration’s continued efforts to hide federally funded facilities from oversight by breaking the law contradicts their lofty, empty promises of law, order, and transparency.

← Newer postsPosts page 30Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(22)

H.R. 10550 (119th)
To require that certain notifications and certifications relating to WIC be available to mem…
H. Res. 1560 (119th)
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4393) to secure the border and reform the immi…
H.R. 10259 (119th)
DHS Community Consultation Act of 2026
H.R. 9848 (119th)
Military Spouse Employment and Child Care Readiness Act
H.R. 9739 (119th)
To prohibit the exercise of the right of eminent domain with respect to Mount Cristo Rey.

Cosponsored Bills(76)

H. Res. 1585 (119th)
Expressing support for "National Public Lands Day" and encouraging the people of the United …
Joined: 2026-09-24
H.R. 10522 (119th)
To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of Department of Health and Human Services funds f…
Joined: 2026-09-21
H. Res. 1545 (119th)
Recognizing the importance of Latino community leadership and engagement in outdoor recreati…
Joined: 2026-09-16
H.R. 10401 (119th)
To require the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to carry out notific…
Joined: 2026-09-15
H.R. 10321 (119th)
To direct the Secretary of Energy to establish best practices for the siting of data centers…
Joined: 2026-09-08

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

617 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-06-12	H.R. 4 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-06-12	S. 331 (119th)	Final passage	NO	YES	✕	Passed
2025-06-11	H. Res. 499 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-11	H. Res. 499 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-10	H.R. 884 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-10	H.R. 2096 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-10	H. Res. 489 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-10	H. Res. 489 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-09	H. Res. 481 (119th)	Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree	NOT_VOTING	YES	—	Passed
2025-06-09	H. Res. 488 (119th)	Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Passed
2025-06-09	H.R. 2035 (119th)	Fast-track passage	NOT_VOTING	YES	—	Passed
2025-06-06	H.R. 2966 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-05	H.R. 2987 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-05	H.R. 2987 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-06-05	H.R. 2931 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-05	H.R. 2931 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-06-04	H.R. 2483 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-06-04	H.R. 2483 (119th)	Approve amendment	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-06-04	H. Res. 458 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-04	H. Res. 458 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-03	H.R. 1804 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-06-03	H.R. 1642 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	H.R. 1 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	H.R. 1 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-05-22	S.J. Res. 31 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	H. Res. 436 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	H. Res. 436 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	H. Res. 436 (119th)	Consideration of the Resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	H. Res. 436 (119th)	Consideration of the Resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-22	—	Motion to Adjourn	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-05-20	S.J. Res. 13 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-20	H.R. 1223 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-20	H. Res. 426 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-20	H. Res. 426 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-19	H.R. 1286 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-19	H.R. 1263 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-15	H.R. 2240 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-15	H.R. 2255 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-14	H. Res. 352 (119th)	Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-14	H.R. 2243 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-14	H. Res. 405 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-14	H. Res. 405 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-14	H.R. 2215 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-13	H.R. 249 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-13	H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)	Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-05-08	H.R. 276 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-08	H.R. 276 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-05-07	H.R. 881 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-05-07	H.R. 1503 (119th)	Fast-track passage	NOT_VOTING	YES	—	Passed
2025-05-06	H. Res. 377 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 13Next →