Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 567
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 73 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I'm hoping that the regular-people edition coming to NBC will be successful enough to convince them that they don't need to stock the pond with reality-show "personalities." The UK version with ordinary folks is so much better (and even the UK celeb version was better) than the US version.
This has become about Trump claiming the right to subdue, menace, and assault any population he considers in opposition to him. ICE is his private army.
We evacuated our kids out of Minneapolis this weekend and my spouse reports that as she drove them out of town she saw "multiple freeway exits where people are being pulled over." It feels like the Twin Cities is being subjugated by a hostile occupying force.
This is a completely reasonable way for any top official to address Trump, given the entirety of his record. You get the discourse you deserve; you receive the courtesy from your opponents that you extend to them.
You lying piece of shit. I chaired the Minnesota DFL for all three of your runs here. I watched you lose. Three times. Minnesota never bought your con. And now, as Chair of the DNC, I’m looking forward to ending Trumpism for good in 2028 — not with lies, but with votes. Again.
Later, the anchorman signs off with "This nation has endured. And, I daresay, endure it will...leaving us in the end, if not stronger, wiser; and if not wiser, stronger; and if, alas, not either, both."
I am going to go for a walk, try to rediscover my serenity, and enter the weekend. No forgiveness for or reconciliation with these wicked people or their supporters ever, ever, ever, ever, ever. Love to the rest of you!
This ICE agent lost it and killed an innocent woman. Despite the bloodthirsty braying of JD Vance, Donald Trump Jr., and Tom Cotton that this is exculpatory, that is what this video "proves." I didn't think Vance could be more of a moral abomination after "They're eating the pets," but I was wrong.
🚨 NEW VIDEO 👇🏽This puts an end to all the lies. Horrific. They were having a calm exchange seconds before he murdered Renee Good, and she was barely moving and clearly avoiding him. Stop the lies.
Okay, a diversion: SAG, the DGA, and the PGA are turning a kind of boring awards season into an enjoyably loony one. The PGA list: Bugonia, F1, Frankenstein, Hamnet, Marty S., One Battle, Sentimental Value, Sinners, Train Dreams, Weapons. Headline: No Avatar, no Wicked. From producers, that's big.
Yes, I really do think for one fucking minute he will let that happen, and I really don't think it's much help or use to scream about how we're not going to have an election. Things are bad enough; we don't need to make them worse.
Defaming a murdered woman and shrugging off her death with a lie is about as evil as it gets and no journalist who gets within shouting distance of this vicious troll should let him have a moment's peace about it.
Vance on X: "Every congressional democrat and every democrat who's running for president should be asked a simple question: Do you think this officer was wrong in defending his life against a deranged leftist who tried to run him over?"
Reposted byMark Harris
Another liar. The ICE agents prevented a local physician from attending to her while she was slumped over in the car after being shot.
Sen. Lankford blatantly lies about what the video of Renee Good's killing shows: "A classic law enforcement moment -- they have to fire their weapon and then when you see her car crash, law enforcement is running to her to provide aid. They're never looking to be able to take a life of individuals."
They are working for the day when they can say that, because once they get there, it's only a short journey to get to the day when they don't even have to say it. The uprising against her murder is going to have to be big enough to convince them it wasn't worth it, if that is possible.
This is in no way a silver lining, but I think the fact that Trump and his henchmen felt instantly compelled to collude in defamatory lies about Renee Good means they knew they couldn't tell the truth, which is that they all see her death--and many more--as a completely acceptable means to an end. >
And yes, I know that nothing costs less than saying this on Bluesky, where we mostly comfort each other in enraged haplessness. But I don't know what else to say. "Wait until the midterms" does not feel viable. We're a week into the new year, and...my God.
There is a grave moral consequence to letting this go on. Shut down the government, have a general strike, grind the country to a halt, hit the streets. But not treating a demented administration lying about its thugs committing cold-blooded murder as an emergency? That is an emergency in itself.
Apologies if I've missed The Discourse, but I just caught up with Lurker & I was very impressed--one of the strongest American indies I've seen this year and a wildly confident debut for writer/director Alex Russell. Great, unnerving take on the toxicity of fame and of wanting to stand next to fame.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
567 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →