Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This administration is a dull-minded, paranoid, gullible old man surrounded by twenty cranks, thousand-year-reich zealots, and single-issue lunatics, all with phones, running around saying, "Show him this! He'll like this! Make sure he sees this!"
Besides linking Tylenol in pregnant women to autism, RFK Jr. now says circumcision is part of the reason why kids are autistic. "Children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, and it's highly likely because they're given Tylenol. None of this is positive..."
This is accurate. "I will never change my mind about anything and will reject as false any information that might cause me to" is a core part of MAGA identity.
Legit don’t think there’s anything Trump could do to drop below like 39-40% approval. He could crash the economy AND have the military shooting people in the streets and he’d still poll at like 39.9% lol
When was the last time Trump was interviewed solo on-camera by a non-servile journalist? Because it's starting to feel like that may not happen again. The risk of him being publicly challenged about factual basic information--like, "Portland is not burning"--is too great for his handlers to permit.
I'm going with Hallowe'en, because the later films do every bad thing that a franchise can do: Reiterate the original, add unnecessary backstory, undercut the first film with new mythology, go backwards, leap forwards, retcon, cut all ties to the original, re-establish those ties...Burn 'em all.
Food for thought: What is the worst franchise made from the best movie?
He's so cognitively garbled that I can't guess what he means at the end, when he says freedom of speech "is always something I felt strongly about, but it never passed the courts." At this point, it's important for Democratic politicians to raise questions about his brain function every single day.
Trump: "We took the freedom of speech away because that's been through the courts and the courts said you have freedom of speech, but what has happened is when they burn a flag it agitates and irritates crowds."
I always felt bad when we got an actor to do a concept-y cover and it didn't work. Here's one, also from the Waterworld summer, that did--thanks to a very game movie star who was up for doing a post-scandal print interview, and an excellent stunt baby!
When I was movie editor at EW, we came up with this idea for a Waterworld cover. We thought it was funny--he'd spent so much time shooting on water--and obv. Costner thought it was funny enough to play along. Readers and the industry HATED it and him--"He's spitting at Hollywood." You never know.
Costner shooting a jet of water out of his mouth next to the headline "Kevin Costner speaks out for the first time about the most expensive gamble in movie history--Waterworld: The Untold Story."
Lots of interesting/grisly financial detail in this Costner piece. But it's odd that Waterworld is always misremembered as a Heaven's Gate-sized disaster. It was a flop relative to cost, but it grossed $88M in the US in '95--it was the #12 movie of the year. www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie...
In memory, Waterworld and The Postman (1997) often get merged. But in reality Waterworld was the movie that made people say Costner was grandiose and difficult to work with; The Postman (which ran 3 hours and couldn't even gross $20M) was the movie that made the industry say, okay, he's done.
They will insist that this an overstatement, that this isn't the same as APPROVING conversion therapy, that it's "not what the case is about." But if you are an adult with a functioning moral core, you cannot divorce your actions from their consequences. This will kill kids, period, the end.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →