That’s true. But I think the consistent tone that the Democratic center is the party and the Democratic left is the threat to the party is hard to miss. One thing is treated as the body and the other as the disease that could kill the body.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8
Mark Harris
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 593
Yes75%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 75 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Was there a headline last week that read “A Stunning Win in Michigan Shows the Limits of Centrism”? I can’t seem to find it.
Separately and important issue: Why did polling overestimate the chances of El-Sayed and Hong by 15 points? That seems bad!
I am generally skeptical of boycotts. But I don't think one can overstate the degree to which J.K. Rowling has chosen to make loathing of trans people and cruelty about them into her primary identity. Nobody on earth will suffer from skipping the Harry Potter series. Let's not make her richer.
It's not.
I don't know how effective a viewer boycott of the show could be--I guess we'll see--but I do think a media boycott would have some impact. If all the websites that would ordinarily cover this from every angle just greet it with oceans of silence...maybe it'd mean something.
We're back to the eternal "Stupid, senile, dishonest, or insane?" question. (Please check all that apply.)
"I've only had an account here for 12 minutes and I don't really follow anyone but HERE'S WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE" remains my favorite flavor of Bluesky self-immolation.
My sense is that most gay bathhouses that were essentially fronts for sex clubs did go away post-'86 (although at least one stuck around), but that a thriving underground of large word-of-mouth sex parties in various loft/warehouse spaces that charge an admission fee emerged to fill the void.
I agree; for me, this is the strongest argument. And if ppl also want to say these businesses should be allowed to exist like any other, I'm fine w that. But imo the "harm reduction" case is pretty thin; it's hard to claim harm reduction while saying in the same breath that there's no real risk now.
Reposted byMark Harris
Shockingly good, non-derogatory, and non-condescending NYT article about how progressives are energizing voters and winning elections. My only beef: They're not "far-left." They are non-compromised Democrats. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/10/u... (gift link)
If state or city health agencies become involved, it gets messier quickly.
Yeah, but I think an awareness of them is implicit in "It's 2026, not 1986. We have modern medicine and education."
We don't really have all that many bathhouses of that type anymore.
This is a messier and more complicated issue than can probably be discussed here on Bluesky without it devolving into a shouting match, but it's interesting in terms of gay history and NYC history, so...giftlink! www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/n...
There are a lot of reasons for this, ranging from low theater availability because shows are now occupying houses forever in the desperate hope that they might recoup one of these years to producer aversion because the last couple of seasons have been a bloodbath. From any angle, not good news.
Related: Right now only 12 Broadway shows are scheduled to open before the end of the year (one of the 12 already opened/flopped). Excluding covid, that is the lowest total in at least 15 years, and maybe ever? More shows could get added, I guess, but right now...the crisis is getting more crisis-y.
For several reasons, I don't think Cats: The Jellicle Ball is the ideal test case for "If this show can't make it on Broadway, Broadway is broken." But this piece uses its closing to make several good points about the severity of the...crisis is not too strong a word. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/o...
From Ross Douthat's final column: "I lived through the years of peak woke, and it was a McCarthyite experience."
Can a sentence die of embarrassment?
He has actually spoken about a wide range of subjects and the signature line that helped him win the primary is about three issues: Super PAC influence, the economy, and Medicare for all. So perhaps he's not the one with the obsession.
I try to remind myself that one demographic that is very overrepresented on Facebook is people who can't get anyone to listen to them in real life.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History593 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
593 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.