Second, the Court found that, as he did with the tariffs, the President acted ultra vires - or basically, without any authority. In fact, the law, requires Congressional approval of changes to any of our historic places in D.C., including the White House and our important monuments.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 3
Teresa Leger Fernandez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes37%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Teresa Leger Fernandez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 3
SoupScore
Teresa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 63 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
First, the Court reviewed the Constitution and the Property Clause, which gives Congress complete authority over public lands. And yes, that was a case that came out of New Mexico - we do love our public lands.
It’s important to understand what this case just did and how that might affect Trump’s other attempts to slap his name and image on our national treasures, demolish our national heritage, and build statues and monuments to himself.
Here is a quick review of the case:
💡EXPLAINER: Trump may think the White House is Mar-a-Lago North, but a judge just reminded him: the White House “does not belong to any one man, not even the President.”
They always find money for war but never for health care.
Thanks to their massive health care cuts, we could lose 5+ rural hospitals and clinics in my district alone.
That’s the cost of their priorities.
Americans deserve better. I want to hear how Trump’s War Tax is affecting your life. Tell me your story at Fernandez.house.gov/story
We fought all day to pass the bipartisan Senate bill to pay TSA, FEMA, and Coast Guard workers after 43 days with no paycheck. Every House Republican said no and kept the government shut down.
It’s almost midnight and we’re just getting out of votes. Not a single Republican joined us to reopen the government—even with a bipartisan Senate bill to fund TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard. Shame.
I just got out of a Rules Committee meeting on the government funding bill. Here’s what you should know:
Every single House Rules Republican voted to continue the shutdown instead of passing the Senate’s bipartisan TSA/FEMA funding bill.
Republicans said it themselves: this shutdown is on them.
You may be wondering why the House hasn’t passed the TSA funding bill sent over by the Senate this morning. The answer is simple: Republicans don’t listen to the American people.
Today is payday for TSA.
House Republicans are 43 days late paying TSA and the Coast Guard—and still refusing to bring the bill to the floor.
Today, Senate Republicans finally caved and passed the Democratic bill to pay TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard without a blank check for a lawless ICE.
I’m staying in DC to get the law abiding agencies and agents PAID. (2/2)
43 days of pain. Missed paychecks. Real fear.
Yesterday, Trump acknowledged he could have paid TSA agents all along. (1/2)
BREAKING: Every package that arrives at your front door will soon have an 8% Trump War Tax.
🚨HAPPENING NOW: Stop by walk-in office hours in our Las Vegas office today! My staff will be available until 3 PM.
Our TSA, FEMA, and Coast Guard employees have now gone 38 days without a paycheck because Republicans refuse to hold ICE to the same standards that our other law enforcement officials already practice.
Many Republicans have now admitted that ICE has sufficient funding from their Big Ugly Bill.
Yet, they refuse to pass a bill to immediately fund TSA, FEMA and the Coast Guard because they say ICE needs more money.
Make it make sense.
If it’s good enough for Trump, why isn’t it good enough for working Americans?
Trump refuses to negotiate and fund TSA.
He’s told Republicans to not make any deals with Democrats.
The American people need functioning airports not presidential tantrums.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11