At a Glance

Seat

Representative for California District 49

Born

October 28, 1978

Age 47

Phone

(202) 225-3906

Office

2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 612

Yes46%

No53%

Present1%

Not Voting1%

Party align97%

Cross-party3%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Bluesky Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Mike Levin

U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49

SoupScore

Mike's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 101 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 30(source)

The California primary is June 2. Fill out your ballot today, sign the envelope, and drop it in any official ballot drop box or head to your nearest vote center. No stamp needed. Five minutes, done. Track it at wheresmyballot.sos.ca.gov.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 30(source)

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 29(source)

A federal judge just ordered Trump’s name off the Kennedy Center. Good. It never belonged there. The name is coming down, now or later. If they’re short a volunteer, I will personally climb the ladder and take the name down myself.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 29(source)

They are not in Washington to drain the swamp. They are bottling it and selling it back to you.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 29(source)

My Appropriations amendment was simple. Bar the President, the Vice President, and members of Congress from cashing in on Trump’s $1.8 billion January 6th slush fund, unless a court actually awarded them the money. Every Republican on the committee who was present voted no.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

People voted for Trump because he promised to bring those costs down on day one. We are more than sixteen months in, and costs keep climbing. His party. Your bills.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

While the president is focused on building a one-night-only fight cage on the White House lawn for his birthday and tearing down the East Wing for his ballroom, can anyone explain how any of it lowers your grocery bill? Your electric bill? Your medical bills?

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

The Supreme Court is the only court in America with no enforceable code of conduct. I support withholding funding from the Court until the justices adopt a binding code with real recusal review. Congress holds the power of the purse. We should use it. www.notus.org/us-news/samu...

Samuel Alito’s Son Has Been Quietly Working for Trump’s Treasury Department

Philip Alito has been working as an attorney with the Treasury’s office of the general counsel for months even as the Supreme Court takes up cases involving the department.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

That fight could be headed to the Court too. This is exactly why the honor system has failed.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

A justice ruling on cases involving the very agency that employs his son fails that test on its face. And Treasury sits at the center of many upcoming issues, including the fight over Trump’s $1.776 billion dollar fund to reward the January 6th rioters he pardoned.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

The federal recusal law is plain. A justice must step aside in any case where his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. That is the test. Not whether anyone can prove influence but whether a reasonable person looking at this would doubt it.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

Philip Alito served as an attorney-adviser in Treasury’s general counsel office, briefed on department matters across the board, while SCOTUS took a case in which the Treasury Department was a named defendant. The department never disclosed the connection in court. Justice Alito did not recuse.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

Samuel Alito’s son has worked as a lawyer inside Trump’s Treasury Department since early last year. The administration hid it. No public resume, no mention on the Treasury website, outdated bar listings. Four former officials confirmed it. The public was never told. Here is why that matters.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

Trump is doing it June 14. And the people who called Obama undignified for putting his feet on the desk have nothing to say.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 28(source)

Can you imagine if Obama had hosted a cage fight on the South Lawn of the White House. On his own birthday. With 1,000 tickets handed to himself. While Republican lobbyists begged for the leftovers. Fox would have run a 24-hour countdown clock to impeachment.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 27(source)

The walls are closing in. Kill the slush fund. Claw back every dollar. And if the court finds fraud, hold every person who signed that agreement accountable. www.nytimes.com/2026/05/27/u...

Former Judges Urge Inquiry Into Deal Trump Struck With I.R.S.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 27(source)

The former judges told the court the deal “raises profound questions about the parties’ candor toward the court and manipulation of the judicial system.” Translation: this looks like fraud. Senate Republicans are already balking. Capitol Police officers injured on January 6th are suing.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 27(source)

Hours later, a “settlement” magically appeared: a $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded slush fund to pay off his allies, including January 6 insurrectionists, plus blanket immunity from past IRS investigations for him, his sons, and his businesses.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 27(source)

Trump sued his own IRS in January demanding $10 billion. The judge started asking hard questions, because the President was literally on both sides of the case. Two days before briefs were due, Trump yanked the suit.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgMay 27(source)

BREAKING: 35 former federal judges, bipartisan, just asked the court to reopen Trump’s sham lawsuit against the IRS and investigate whether the so-called “settlement” was a fraud on the court. Here is what happened.

← Newer postsPosts page 23Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(25)

H.R. 9753 (119th)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain retirement plan distributions u…
H.R. 7942 (119th)
To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit the listing of contracts relating to war, de…
H.R. 7879 (119th)
To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Se…
H.R. 7598 (119th)
To amend title 38, United States Code, to refund the amount of fees for a housing loans guar…
H.R. 7543 (119th)
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate certain li…

Cosponsored Bills(101)

H.R. 10114 (119th)
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15642 Sand Canyon A…
Joined: 2026-08-17
H. Res. 1470 (119th)
Expressing support for the designation of July 2026 as "Plastic Pollution Action Month".
Joined: 2026-08-03
H.R. 9929 (119th)
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4640 Cass Street in…
Joined: 2026-07-23
H.R. 9808 (119th)
No Passes for Polluters Act of 2026
Joined: 2026-07-21
H.R. 9647 (119th)
To prohibit the National Science Foundation from obligating or expending Federal funds to de…
Joined: 2026-07-13

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

612 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-04-30	H.J. Res. 89 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-30	H.J. Res. 87 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-29	H.J. Res. 60 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-29	H.R. 859 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-29	H.R. 1442 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-29	H.R. 1402 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-29	H. Res. 354 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-29	H. Res. 354 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-28	S. 146 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-28	H.R. 973 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-10	H.R. 22 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-10	H.R. 22 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-04-10	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Accept Senate changes	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-10	H.R. 1228 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-10	H.R. 1526 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-09	H.R. 1526 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-04-09	S.J. Res. 18 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-09	S.J. Res. 28 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-09	H. Res. 313 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-09	H. Res. 313 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-08	H. Res. 294 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-08	H. Res. 294 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-04-07	H.R. 1039 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-07	H.R. 586 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-01	H.R. 1491 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-04-01	H. Res. 282 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-04-01	H. Res. 282 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-31	H.R. 997 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-31	H.R. 517 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-27	H.R. 1048 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-27	H.R. 1048 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-03-27	H.R. 1048 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-03-27	H.R. 1048 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-03-27	H.R. 1048 (119th)	Approve amendment	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-03-27	H.J. Res. 75 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-27	H.J. Res. 24 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-25	H. Res. 242 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-25	H. Res. 242 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-25	H.R. 1534 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-24	H.R. 1326 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-24	H.R. 359 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-11	H.J. Res. 25 (119th)	Final passage	YES	NO	✕↔	Passed
2025-03-11	H.R. 1968 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-11	H.R. 1968 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-03-11	H.R. 1156 (119th)	Final passage	YES	NO	✕↔	Passed
2025-03-11	H. Res. 211 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-11	H. Res. 211 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-03-10	H.R. 993 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-10	H.R. 901 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-03-10	H.R. 495 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 13Next →