We need both border security AND to treat people with dignity. Those values should not be in conflict.
So if every ICE detainee is being treated lawfully and with humanity, why does the administration want to prevent Congress from conducting unannounced oversight so badly?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 516
Yes44%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 90 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Very saddened by the loss of Jason Collins.
We were classmates at Stanford, and years later he became one of my earliest supporters when I first ran for Congress.
Jason changed the world by being exactly who he was, with quiet courage, warmth, and a kindness you felt the moment you met him.
This is your reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
The wildfire tearing through the Everglades in Florida is a stark reminder of the courage our firefighters show every single day.
My thoughts are with those forced to evacuate and everyone working to keep this fire from spreading further.
Reposted byMike Levin
American families are already stretched thin at the pump. Now Trump says doubling gas prices would be worth it for his unauthorized war in Iran.
He is not the one paying that price. You are. And he does not seem to care how high it goes.
American families are already stretched thin at the pump. Now Trump says doubling gas prices would be worth it for his unauthorized war in Iran.
He is not the one paying that price. You are. And he does not seem to care how high it goes.
Reposted byMike Levin
The White House and the CFTC owe Americans a full accounting.
Who is profiting from advance knowledge of US military operations, who provided that information, and when does the investigation begin?
Anyone with classified knowledge of when our troops will be sent into harm's way should never be permitted to bet on it.
That is exactly why I introduced the DEATH BETS Act, to restrict markets that resolve on military actions, regime change, and deaths that reward access to classified information.
Since the war in Iran began, traders on Polymarket have bet more than half a billion dollars on when American bombs would fall, hundreds of millions more on whether Iran's Supreme Leader would be removed, and additional fortunes on terrorism, regime change, the timing of a nuclear detonation.
The White House and the CFTC owe Americans a full accounting.
Who is profiting from advance knowledge of US military operations, who provided that information, and when does the investigation begin?
Reposted byMike Levin
In that time, prices have climbed, we’re in an unauthorized war, and millions have lost health care. That is the record voters will weigh in November, and it is apparently not a record Steve Bannon or Donald Trump want to defend on a level playing field.
Reposted byMike Levin
In February, Steve Bannon said on his podcast, “You’re damn right we’re going to have ICE surround the polls come November.”
Yesterday, the President announced he wants an “Election Integrity Army” in every state this November.
It is worth asking why anyone would want armed agents at the polls.
So rather than earn your vote, they are working to keep you from casting it.
In that time, prices have climbed, we’re in an unauthorized war, and millions have lost health care. That is the record voters will weigh in November, and it is apparently not a record Steve Bannon or Donald Trump want to defend on a level playing field.
For 16 months, one party has held the White House, the Senate, the House, and a Supreme Court majority.
In February, Steve Bannon said on his podcast, “You’re damn right we’re going to have ICE surround the polls come November.”
Yesterday, the President announced he wants an “Election Integrity Army” in every state this November.
It is worth asking why anyone would want armed agents at the polls.
Reposted byMike Levin
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History516 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
516 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11