Accountability is not optional. The American people deserve the full truth, and we will continue pressing until we get it.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
More than a month after the legal deadline, the Department of Justice now claims it has “found” over one million additional Epstein-related files.
That explanation raises serious concerns about compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Public service is not supposed to come with a luxury SUV package.
Yet Kash Patel wants a taxpayer-funded fleet of armored BMW SUVs. Americans are being asked to tighten their belts, but apparently not Kash Patel.
Taxpayers deserve answers.
www.forbes.com/sites/alison...
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Johnson knows what happens if the ACA tax credits expire: premiums spike and 1.8 million Americans lose coverage in 2026 alone, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. He has the power to allow a vote and stop it but refuses.
Total cowardice in the face of preventable harm.
From our family to yours, Merry Christmas to all who celebrate! 🎄
Mike Johnson knows what happens if the ACA tax credits expire: premiums spike and 1.8 million Americans lose coverage in 2026 alone, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. He has the power to allow a vote and stop it but refuses.
Total cowardice in the face of preventable harm.
Reposted byMike Levin
I will always support the deportation of violent criminals who threaten public safety. But immigration enforcement must also be lawful, targeted, and humane.
This holiday season, tens of thousands of people are being held in ICE detention facilities.
Good immigration policy must be grounded in two principles: security and humanity.
We can enforce the law and remove violent criminals while still upholding due process, human dignity, and America’s core values.
That balance is worth reflecting on this Christmas.
Nationally, analyses of ICE detention data indicate that roughly 73% of detainees have no criminal record, while about 5% have been convicted of violent offenses.
Publicly available government data and independent analyses show that the majority of people being taken into ICE custody do not have criminal convictions.
Many have lived in the United States for years, worked, raised families, and contributed to their communities.
Multiple government reports, court filings, and congressional oversight visits have documented serious concerns about overcrowding, medical care, and detainees’ ability to reach family.
Important questions remain unanswered about confinement conditions and whether basic rights are being protected.
I will always support the deportation of violent criminals who threaten public safety. But immigration enforcement must also be lawful, targeted, and humane.
This holiday season, tens of thousands of people are being held in ICE detention facilities.
From our family to yours, we wish you a wonderful Christmas Eve!
A dangerous storm is impacting much of Southern California this holiday. Emergency personnel are deploying statewide. I pray that all residents follow their guidance and remain safe.
We will weather this storm together.
Law enforcement in America belongs to civilian authorities and the courts, not soldiers sent into our cities at a president’s whim.
Even in a moment when democratic norms are under extraordinary strain, the Supreme Court drew a line and reinforced that presidents don’t get to turn the military into a domestic police force.
Shutting them down weakens the grid, kills jobs, and creates a real security risk by leaving us with less reliable power when demand is surging.
This move is unbelievably stupid.
These offshore wind projects went through years of review by the FAA and the Pentagon and were already approved, built, and in some cases operating.
Claiming “national security” now is nonsense.
Anyone standing in the way of justice for the Epstein victims must be held to account. Release the files.
Follow the law.
Let the truth come out.
Reposted byMike Levin
This Epstein files cover-up should cost Pam Bondi her job.
When the Justice Department delays or withholds records tied to one of the most notorious criminal cases in modern history, we must demand accountability.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.