The tax code should reward hard work, not just wealth. The EITC helps working families get ahead, but too many workers are left behind. My bill, the #WRCRAct, would create a fairer tax system—one that values labor, including unpaid labor, over tax breaks for the rich.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 228 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Speaking up WORKS. We must keep the pressure on.
Keep making your voices heard, and I promise I will never stop speaking up for my constituents, and Americans in every zip code, who would suffer if they could not access their Social Security benefits.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
For half a century, the EITC has been a lifeline for hardworking Americans, lifting millions out of poverty and rewarding work.
I’m fighting to protect and expand the EITC because the tax code should work for Americans building a better life — not just the wealthy few.
Today I was joined by @chu.house.gov & amazing advocates to reintroduce the Worker Relief and Credit Reform Act, which would modernize and expand the EITC.
It's time for a tax code that works for WORKERS, not more tax giveaways to the wealthiest few.
#EITC50 #WRCRact
Today is #EqualPayDay—a reminder that women still earn less than men for the same work. Equal work deserves equal pay.
Now is the time to push forward, not to rollback decades of progress by stripping protections for women in the workplace.
🚨"A flood of cuts led by Elon Musk has sent the agency into chaos."
The GOP plan: sacrifice the social safety net to make room for tax cuts for Elon and Wall Street.
Fail to be born rich or get rich? Have the audacity to get old? You're on your own.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Billionaire Howard Lutnick and the GOP say missing a Social Security check is no big deal. Tell that to the millions of Americans who need it.
This isn’t just callous commentary—it’s insight in to the GOP: they don’t care about you so why not starve Social Security.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Trump and Musk’s cuts are already slowing service, causing confusion, and harming our seniors.
Social security beneficiaries, the majority of whom are women, deserve their hard-earned benefits.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk don't think senior citizens and disabled Americans deserve to get a real person on the phone to assist with their Social Security benefits.
I joined postal workers today to say HELL NO to Trump’s plans to privatize USPS.
The postal service is right there in the Constitution. It is meant to serve the American people in every zip code.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Today marks 15 years since Affordable Care Act was signed into law!
As we celebrate the ACA, it seems like a great day to share my first post on here looking back at some moments in its history to tell the story of how it happened.
Thank you to all my constituents who attended my town hall today in Glendale.
Stay tuned for where I’ll be next!
Milwaukee labor leader Dan Bukiewicz: ‘Scary times for the American worker.’
This Administration is now pausing work on the Microsoft data center supported by the Biden administration being built on the failed Foxconn site.
Trump is punishing Wisconsin workers for his failures.
⬆️Layoffs
⬆️Inflation
⬇️GDP forecast
⬇️Stock market
Trump's own Treasury Secretary says he 'can't guarantee' there won't be a recession under Trump.
I guess when Trump said he would turn things around on day one, he meant he would put the economy in reverse.
An unelected foreign billionaire got a briefing at our nations military headquarters about U.S.-China strategy -- a country which his companies are entangled with to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.
The GOP is outsourcing national security to an erratic oligarch.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.