Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes38%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 163 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It will be a welcoming, accessible, green space for residents in NY-12 to relax, play, and perform throughout every season, and I am thrilled for this new chapter in our community.
The new park design breaks down barriers that have obstructed our community for far too long and reflects the needs and desires of New Yorkers.
Last night, I joined my fellow leaders on the Upper West Side to break ground on the Damrosch Park portion of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Lincoln Center West Initiative. @lincolncenter.bsky.social
Sec. Duffy, pause your Hollywood dreams and do the job taxpayers are paying for. Stop attacking programs that benefit NYers–from congestion pricing to infrastructure projects–and start protecting travelers who are sick of aviation incidents, surging fuel costs, and greedy corporations running wild.
No wonder the Department of Transportation is a mess–Secretary Duffy is too busy chasing his reality TV star dreams to be working for American travelers.
nymag.com/intelligence...
I am proud to have led this bipartisan legislation and look forward to continuing the fight for respect and equal protection under the law for all pregnant people.
This Mother’s Day, I am celebrating the millions of hard-working American women who no longer have to choose between their health and their paycheck thanks to the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.
Allowing handguns to be shipped through USPS as simply as postcards is ridiculous, unnecessary, and will only worsen the gun violence epidemic plaguing our communities.
apnews.com/article/usps...
At a time when mass shootings, deadly accidents, and intentional gun violence are far too common, the Trump administration is trying to weaken safety regulations by rolling back a nearly century-old law.
I will continue monitoring this case and, as a proud member of @reprocaucus.bsky.social, I will never stop fighting to protect access to reproductive health care, including medication abortion, for all.
thehill.com/regulation/c...
I am deeply concerned about the Fifth Circuit’s decision restricting the mailing of this clinically necessary drug and the potential impacts nationwide should it be allowed to take effect after the Supreme Court stay.
Mifepristone is a safe, effective, FDA-approved medication that has helped millions of people end their pregnancies and manage their miscarriages.
I am glad the Supreme Court temporarily restored access to Mifepristone. But the threats against access to abortion are far from over.
Donald Trump’s White House is a circus and no amount of showmanship will fix the problems he’s caused at the grocery store, gas pump, and doctors’ offices.
www.mediaite.com/media/sports...
Americans: We’re in desperate need of financial relief from Trump’s ongoing war in Iran and worsening affordability crisis.
Trump: Look! Bright lights and bloody knuckles on the White House lawn!
Thank you, #nurses, for your compassion and dedication to caring for our city.
I have always stood with our city's nurses, fighting to ensure their heroic work is respected with fair contracts and safe work conditions. Nurses must have the tools they need to provide patients with high-quality, safe healthcare.
Nurses in NY-12 and nationwide are on the frontlines of caring for our most vulnerable communities.
Public health must be guided by evidence and experts, not politics.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.