Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 152 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today, @raskin.house.gov and I called on Judiciary Republicans to convene a Committee hearing after DHS agents forcibly entered my district office without a warrant or consent and handcuffed a member of my staff.
Happy #PrideMonth! 🏳️🌈
This month, we celebrate love, authenticity, and the courage of the LGBTQI+ community.
I’m proud to stand with the LGBTQI+ community, this month and every month, in the fight for full equality.
Trump’s reckless reconciliation bill includes the biggest SNAP cut in history—threatening to take food off the table for millions. Parents, kids, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities will pay the price.
www.americanprogress.org/article/hous...
Beyond the cruelty, these shameful tactics are designed to make immigrants afraid to engage with our legal system. Combined with efforts to gut asylum and end TPS protections, the Trump Administration is making it impossible to come “the right way.”
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/u...
Republicans love to say immigrants should “come the right way.” But when immigrants follow the law and show up to court, they’re being ambushed by ICE and fast-tracked for deportation.
Today’s court decision striking down Trump’s unlawful tariffs is a win for the Constitution and the rule of law.
The Court made clear what Republicans refused to confront: Trump’s abuse of emergency powers to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs violated the law and the separation of powers.
This ruling confirms what I’ve said from the start: there’s no legitimate legal basis for the Trump Administration to shut down congestion pricing.
Today, the court agreed, temporarily blocking the administration’s threats to cut off critical transportation funding and calling out its abuse of power for what it is.
This morning, I stood with fellow congestion pricing advocates to send a clear message to Donald Trump: New Yorkers won’t back down. We’re reducing traffic, cutting pollution, and investing in better transit.
I told the Commission what I’ve said many times: if President Trump were serious about combating antisemitism, he would start with his own administration—including firing Kingsley Wilson, Ed Martin, and Sebastian Gorka. Instead, Trump has promoted Wilson to serve as the Pentagon’s press secretary.
Last week, I participated in a Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearing, where I highlighted Kingsley Wilson’s history of antisemitism.
He was also the Dean of our NYS Congressional Delegation. But most importantly he was a friend and a former colleague that I will personally miss. May his memory be a blessing.
I’m saddened to hear about the passing of former Congressman Charlie Rangel. Charlie was a trailblazer thoughtout his life. From being a decorated WWII veteran to being a founding Member of the Congressional Black Caucus to the first African American Chair of the Ways and Means Committee.
As we mourn, we must recommit to rooting out the vile scourge of antisemitism that reared its violent head to take two innocent lives. May their memory be for a blessing.
In this devastating moment, Rep. Schneider and I led every member of the Congressional Jewish Caucus in a statement condemning the antisemitic murder of two Israeli Embassy employees, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, outside a Jewish community event at the Capital Jewish Museum.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.