Brad Sherman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 32
Born
October 24, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 225-5911
Office
2365 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32

Brad Sherman

Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 32

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Brad Sherman headshot
Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This will be an opportunity for our community to come together and discuss all the critical issues we face: our recovery from the #LosAngelesWildfires, #DonaldTrump and #ElonMusk's dismantling of critical services, the impact of Trump's escalating trade war and much more.
We'll be hosting an In-Person #TownHall for constituents of California's 32nd District on Saturday, April 26, from 2:30 PM - 4 PM, at California State University Northridge (CSUN) Register to Attend ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/Register Tickets will be sent to residents of CA-32 who register.
Secretary #Hegseth lied to the American people, saying that “nobody was texting war plans” when that’s exactly what he was doing – down to the very minute of the strike. Hegseth’s actions directly endangered American servicemembers & blatantly mishandled classified information. #HegsethMustResign
Join our Telephone #TownHall tonight at 7 PM to voice your thoughts on the many critical issues facing the country. We will be joined by two special guests to discuss challenging the Trump-Musk actions: ➡️ California Attorney General Rob Bonta ➡️ @democracyforward.org Senior Advisor Nikki McKinney
Today, I reintroduced my bill, the Accountability for Terrorist Perpetrators of #October7th Act, to finally sanction the Popular Resistance Committees - a heinous group that's never been sanctioned by the U.S. despite waging terror against innocent Americans, Israelis and Palestinians for years. 1/2
Congressman @meeks.house.gov is right – this reckless breach of our national security by senior #Trump Admin. officials must be investigated by @houseforeign.bsky.social The American people deserve to know whether this Admin. mishandled classified information & put U.S. servicemembers at risk.
RM @meeks.house.gov: I'm immediately calling on Chairman Mast to hold a hearing on what might be the most astonishing breach of our national security in recent history, where top leadership from DOD, State, Treasury, the CIA & even the VP himself used a commercial messaging app—Signal—to... (1/3)
According to the #Trump admin, people who complain if their #SocialSecurity check doesn’t come for a month are mostly fraudsters. This SOB can’t imagine it’s somebody who actually needs the money to live. Commerce Sec. #Lutnick's model is his mother-in-law who has a billionaire as a son-in-law.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
615 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONO✓Passed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Failed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYES✕Passed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONO✓Passed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Agreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYES✓Passed
2025-06-24—Motion to AdjournYESYES✓Failed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionNOYES✕Passed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-06-12—Motion to AdjournYESYES✓Failed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYES✕Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 13Next →