Yesterday, I joined my @oversightdemocrats.house.gov colleagues in Los Angeles for a field hearing on the human impact of these raids.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 26
Julia Brownley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes40%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 26
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Julia Brownley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 26
SoupScore
Julia's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 265 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Families in my district and beyond have endured an emotional gauntlet as federal agents carry out cruel and lawless operations with little regard for due process or basic humanity.
The raids carried out by ICE and CBP across the country have unleashed fear, chaos, and trauma in communities that are simply trying to live their lives.
A great nation is only as strong as the education of its people. I refuse to let Trump — who has never once stood up for America’s public schools — undermine the very institutions that give every child a fair shot at the American Dream.
Every child deserves the opportunity to reach their full potential. The Trump administration’s ongoing attempts to dismantle the Department of Education aren’t just reckless — they’re illegal, and they’re a direct threat to our children, our workforce, and our future.
My Democratic colleagues and I will fight this assault on our environment with the full force of our values — because our coast, our communities, and our climate are worth that fight.
At a time when oil companies are making record profits and sitting on unused leases, there is no justification for putting our coastline back on the chopping block.
We know what offshore drilling means for our communities: oil spills, toxic exposure, threats to our fisheries, travel, and tourism industries, and lasting harm to the families who already bear the greatest burdens of pollution.
The Trump administration is once again putting corporate profits ahead of the health and safety of the American people — this time by reopening California’s coast to offshore oil and gas drilling.
Reversing course does not erase the harm or the intent behind this proposal, and serious questions remain about how such an unacceptable idea was ever allowed to move forward.
This wasn’t just a bad decision – it exposed the Trump administration’s dangerous and ill-conceived approach to governing. Our servicemembers and our country deserve far better than policies that legitimize hatred or minimize its impact.
The fact that the Coast Guard even considered reclassifying these as anything less is outrageous. It was so reckless and so out of touch with reality that they were forced to reverse course almost immediately.
Swastikas and nooses are symbols of hatred, antisemitism, racism, and violence. There is no gray area here, and these symbols have absolutely no place in our military.
Political violence has no place in America, and Trump should unequivocally condemn all acts of political violence rather than provoke them. And the refusal to stand up to this rhetoric enables it, normalizes it, and puts more Americans in danger.
This conduct is beneath the Office of the President of the United States. Leaders should defend American values, not betray them.
His words are unhinged, reckless, and dangerous. He has already incited violence before, and he is once again putting the lives of Americans at real and immediate risk.
Trump, who has never served a single day in uniform, continues to attack the institutions that safeguard our freedoms and to lash out with incendiary rhetoric against anyone who challenges him.
To question their loyalty to this country is offensive, dishonest, and beneath even the lowest standard of leadership.
Every one of them is a true American patriot. They have defended this country on the battlefield, in national security service, and in the halls of Congress. They continue to serve with duty and honor.
Jason Crow, Chris DeLuzio, Chrissy Houlahan, and Mark Kelly have worn the uniform. Maggie Goodlander and Elissa Slotkin have served in critical national security roles.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.