
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Tennessee District 9
Steve Cohen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 518
Yes40%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Steve Cohen
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTennessee District 9
SoupScore
Steve's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 53 sponsored · 297 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’ll be on NewsNation in half an hour and CNN later tonight so tune in.
Thank you.
After 19 years serving the 9th District, I made the decision to not run in the new gerrymandered districts created from it. If the courts restore the current 9th until 2028, I’ll remain a candidate, though that’s unlikely. Representing Memphis for 47 years has been the honor of my lifetime.
Reposted bySteve Cohen
@repcohen.bsky.social did good work for Memphis and his district. Cohen said the proven racist felon Trump is, “the greatest threat to democracy and to decorum and grace that we’ve ever seen.” To split up the 2 largest cities, Nashville and Memphis isn't good.
www.youtube.com/live/GP7ggxZ...
Have a blessed day
Reposted bySteve Cohen
@democrats-judiciary.house.gov @judiciarydems.senate.gov
@whitehouse.senate.gov @booker.senate.gov @klobuchar.senate.gov @schiff.senate.gov @coons.senate.gov @blumenthal.senate.gov @padilla.senate.gov @raskin.house.gov @neguse.house.gov @repmoskowitz.bsky.social @repcohen.bsky.social
John Roberts says the SCOTUS isn't political, then scurries to service the GOP when they can't win on their own merit.
What did the SCOTUS do when Trump got nervous after VA? They JUMPED INTO ACTION to gut the VRA and steal the voice of an entire city.
They're the political arm of the White House.
The TN GOP is willing to strip away voting rights that people died for—and to deny the second largest city in their own state effective representation in Congress for decades to come—just to try and help Trump avoid Democratic oversight for another 2 years.
Memphis isn't going down without a fight.
Go Spartans!
Vladimir thank you for your post. You have been and always will be an inspiration to me not to give up and to fight against all odds for justice and democracy
Reposted bySteve Cohen
The ongoing gerrymandering race in the U.S. has just claimed the Tennessee district of Congressman Steve Cohen @repcohen.bsky.social, ranking member of the U.S. Helsinki Commission, OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Special Representative on Political Prisoners, and...
👇
On the CNN 2 minutes
Be on CNN in about 4 minutes re: Tn. Jim Crow redistricting
And just like that, the TN GOP voted to enforce a racial gerrymander of Memphis and strip our city of effective representation for decades.
Trump knows he HAS TO rig the game to keep his majority in November. And the TN GOP was willing to go along with it.
It’s shameful.
Next stop is the courts.
Proud to stand up for Memphis in the TN State Legislature today alongside State Senators Raumesh Akbari, London Lamar & the legendary Stacey Abrams of Georgia.
The TN GOP wants to sacrifice our voice and our city’s future just for Trump to hold onto power for 2 more years.
Not without a fight.
Testifying now before the TN State Senate Judiciary Committee.
I will never stop fighting for Memphis.
More to come.
Gov. Bill Lee has touted the new $400+ Million King's Crossing Bridge for years.
As TN's only Democratic Congressman, Gov. Lee and the TN GOP came to ME to lobby the Biden Admin. for that funding—great for Memphis & the state.
Their new maps would ensure they'd never get that help in the future.
This is insane.
The GOP's newly proposed TN Congressional maps would have people in Shelby County all the way to Williamson County—200+ miles apart—being "represented" by the same Congressman.
It's a blatant, corrupt power grab that would destroy the Black community's and our entire city's voice.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History518 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
518 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.