I’ve joined @raskin.house.gov’s legislation to establish a bipartisan standing body, and act with the Vice President, to remove the President under the guidelines of the 25th Amendment.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maryland District 3
Sarah Elfreth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 518
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sarah Elfreth
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaryland District 3
SoupScore
Sarah's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 96 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
From the President’s unhinged rants on social media and reckless war mongering via Tweet, it is clear that the President is no longer in possession of himself.
These conversations ensure collaboration to best support our servicemembers and military families in #MD03 and beyond.
Ahead of our annual Readiness Subcommittee Vice Service Posture hearing, I sat down with General Gerring, Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps, to discuss all things military readiness – from on-base housing quality to improving base resilience to working with local partners on modernization.
It’s time for more sunshine – not less.
As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I have the privilege of sitting in regular classified briefings – where this Administration’s answers were utterly insufficient – but almost no answers have been provided to the American public, our servicemembers, or their families.
Senator Graham and I agree on one thing: the White House needs to explain its exit strategy for the President’s Iran war to both Congress and the American people.
The people of this nation place their faith in their representatives to act with integrity. For survivors of assault and harassment across this country, Congress has a responsibility to ensure sexual misconduct does not go unchecked anywhere – and especially in the halls of power.
The allegations were abhorrent, serious, and beneath the dignity of this office. I’m relieved to see the resignations of both Congressmen Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales, and I commend the women who have come forward to tell their stories and hold this institution accountable.
I’ve joined @wassermanschultz.house.gov and @pressley.house.gov’s amicus brief urging the courts to stop this termination, uphold the longstanding bipartisan support for TPS, and not send our neighbors back to countries where their lives are at risk.
The ruling will not only have consequences for those seeking refuge from Haiti and Syria, but for more than 1.3 million TPS holders in our country – including our neighbors from Ukraine, Venezuela, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Nepal, and more.
This month, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Trump Administration can terminate the Temporary Protected Status (or TPS) of individuals from Haiti and Syria – but the implications of this decision are much broader.
It’s through these efforts that we can reach our land conservation goals and continue thinking bigger, bolder, and faster. Stay tuned for updates on this extraordinary new passive park!
This work is only possible because of our local, state, & federal partners – led by @aacoexec.bsky.social, the Naval Academy, Councilwoman Rodvien, & the Earl family – who are committed to protecting the Saltworks Creek Watershed & advancing our vision of accessible, connected parks for all.
Thanks to their extraordinary leadership, yesterday we got 47 acres closer to our conservation goals with Anne Arundel County designating part of the Saltworks Creek Watershed, a vital tributary to the Severn River, as protected land.
Three years ago this week, I went on a rather bumpy golf cart tour of a beautiful forest just next to the Annapolis mall with the Chesapeake Conservancy and philanthropists Jim and Sylvia Earl.
We all know the saying, “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.” Conservation efforts aren’t too dissimilar. How do you responsibly conserve the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Maryland’s other crucial forests and watersheds? One acre at a time!
A special thank you to the Third District’s retiring State elected officials, Senator Pam Beidle, Senator Bryan Simonaire, and Delegate Jen Terrasa on their decades of public service and dedication to our communities!
While Washington remains divisive and an example of how to not solve problems, the bipartisan, collegial work of the MGA provides stability and support to Marylanders during these troubled times.
Before heading back to session in DC tomorrow, I stopped by the State House to thank friends and teammates - the Delegates, Senators, staff, and pages of the Maryland General Assembly - for their hard work on the final day (Sine Die) of their legislative session.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History518 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
518 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-21 | H. Con. Res. 58 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 1949 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.