Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Got a hard crash yesterday evening - required a full “Google to remind myself how to force a reboot” - for having the temerity of turning Bluetooth off and on again when my headphones wouldn’t connect
I think this is you projecting what robotaxis are “meant” to do though. For me, the point of them is to remove human drivers from the road, and make life safer for me and my children, which is why I’m desperate for them not just to be a thing I see on my work trips to San Francisco
It doesn’t feel like I’m doing down the transit-oriented nature of life in London to note that it would be transformational if my children could expect cars to reliably stop at red lights when they’re walking to school
I do find this response to Charlemagne weird because, like… I live in one of the most walkable cities in the world and I am constantly beset by cars driven by psychotic devils
This letter to The Economist makes a decent point. The case for robo taxis probably feels overwhelming in a country where the urban design means you're utterly screwed without a car. It's like how higher crime rates presumably boost the car for security solutions. Not entirely enviable
Reposted byAlex Hern
We‘ve lost one of the most foundational unifying aspects of being British: our shared hatred and distrust of everything yank. No wonder we’re all so divided
It is actually completely mind bending watching a Home Counties numpty scream “Christ is King“ - would have been unimaginable even a year ago - how susceptible their whole personality is to American YouTubers - pathetic really
If it’s AI generated it’s better at producing long-form consistent naturalistic human video than anything I’ve ever seen while simultaneously being about four years behind state of the art for voice
Yeah but all their statements are "her face and voice are based on Anila Bisha" not "this is a video of Anila Bisha lip-synching to an AI generated version of her own voice"
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →