Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 582
Yes76%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

the discount is the phasing in – you don't pay the tax at all until the _next_ time you move house. So long as you stay in a house on which you've paid SDLT, you don't pay the new tax.
"the urban form that has defined human activity for 7,000 years is a flash in the pan. now you can do jobs over email people will return to where their heart yearns: suburbia"
It's not a revenue-raising reform, it's a mildly progressive and hopefully fairly substantially growth-inducing reform. Wealthy people will pay more and poorer people pay less, but the key thing is we'd no longer have a tax system that makes it ruinous to regularly move home
as written it makes it sound like the key difference is that the threshold changes and it only applies to owner-occupiers; it's not. The key difference is that owners of valuable homes would likely pay more over a lifetime but no longer have to pay per-transaction
www.theguardian.com/money/2025/a... fwiw this piece seems to contain one massively misleading passage. the proposal is not for a "national tax… paid by owner-occupiers on… when they sell their home", it's for a tax paid _annually_ that is levied on homeowners once they would have paid stamp duty
no sorry not having this. the third one was decent, but you don't have nostalgia for the harry potter movies because they were good, you have nostalgia for them because you were 10
One of the things we should probably acknowledge about Harry Potter is that as an IP it was hard carried by some incredibly talented people, Alfonso Cuaron directed the 3rd entry between Y tu mamá también and Children of Men, it was kinda lightning in a bottle that they're not gonna recapture.
"Parental responsibility" in the context of online child safety should be read as an argument for giving kids their first smartphone at 18, which would require quite a substantial reshaping of society
I’m worried she’s not going to release Taylor’s versions of the last two and my LP collection is going to have a hole in it
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
582 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingNONOFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingNONOFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division AYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 12Next →