Glenn Ivey headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Maryland District 4
Born
February 27, 1961
Age 65
Phone
(202) 225-8699
Office
1610 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maryland District 4

Glenn Ivey

Glenn Frederick Ivey is an American politician and attorney serving as the U.S. representative for Maryland's 4th congressional district since 2023. The district covers most of the black-majority areas on the Maryland side of the Washington metropolitan area.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 582
Yes42%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Glenn Ivey headshot
Glenn Ivey
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaryland District 4
SoupScore
Glenn's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 2 sponsored · 65 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

President Trump needs to focus on the job at hand: reopening the government, negotiating with Democrats, and fixing the healthcare mess that the House and Senate Republicans created with the trillion dollars of cuts, and extending the ACA tax credits.
Yesterday, a federal judge blocked Trump’s mass layoffs during the shutdown, a major win for federal workers. These weren’t just “cuts” — they were an attack on public servants. I’ll keep fighting to protect jobs and hold this administration accountable.
Millions of Americans are about to see their health care premiums double because Republicans are letting vital tax credits expire. It’s part of a pattern — making it harder for working families to afford the basics. I’m fighting to stop these cuts and make care affordable.
At today’s @cbc.house.gov press conference, I joined my colleagues to speak out on Louisiana v. Callais. This Supreme Court case could strip Black communities of fair representation and weaken the Voting Rights Act. We’re not backing down. The right to vote — and to be represented — is on the line.
@housedemocrats.bsky.social are here to work. While Republicans play politics with people’s health care, we’re fighting to reopen the government, protect working families, and lower costs. We’re ready to negotiate — but we won’t back down from doing what’s right for the American people.
Speaker Mike Johnson is spending more time spreading lies about Democrats wanting health care for undocumented immigrants than helping vulnerable Louisianans access care. We need leadership that shows up for working families — not political theater.
My heart is with the federal workers who’ve been fired over the last few days because of Russ Vought’s reckless agenda. These public servants kept our government running, and they deserve better. Democrats are fighting back to protect their jobs, their health care, and the people they serve.
Republicans shut down the government—and now they want to take away your health care. Last week, I joined faith and Democratic leaders at a prayer vigil to stand up for families who can’t afford to lose coverage. We’re fighting to reopen government and protect care.
As a former prosecutor who cares deeply about our justice system, I am deeply troubled by the Trump Administration’s efforts to turn DoJ into the Department of Retribution. Using the power of the federal government to target and intimidate political opponents tramples on the rule of law.
Trump’s public instructions to AG Pam Bondi weren't subtle: He named three public figures he's long detested and urged the DOJ to prosecute them immediately. Now, less than three weeks later, two of them are under indictment: former FBI Director James Comey and New York AG Letitia James.
Donald Trump and House Republicans gutted health care — and now families are paying the price. Hospitals are closing, premiums are skyrocketing, and care is harder to afford. I’m fighting to reverse these cuts and lower costs for Maryland families.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
582 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12