Adrian Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Nebraska District 3
Born
December 19, 1970
Age 55
Phone
(202) 225-6435
Office
502 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nebraska District 3

Adrian Smith

Adrian Michael Smith is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 48th district in the Nebraska Legislature from 1999 to 2007. Smith is the dean of Nebraska's congressional delegation since 2022 following Jeff Fortenberry's resignation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 586
Yes76%
No22%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Adrian Smith headshot
Adrian Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNebraska District 3
SoupScore
Adrian's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 86 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This was one of RFK Jr.’s first orders after being sworn in. Just an astonishing denial of science and will cause so much pain to the 45 million Americans facing mental health challenges.
The White House: (iii) assess the prevalence of and threat posed by the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, stimulants, and weight-loss drugs;
That has been an inspiration to me every single day that I've served, so I'm grateful for that. And I'm going to spend the next two years figuring out how to thank you all. So thank you, Minnesota.
Senator Tina Smith walking into the Capitol to get sworn in, holding hands with her husband.
At the end of the day, what I am going to miss most about this job isn't the perks and certainly not all of the attention. It's going to be that feeling that I have from all of you of being invited into your living rooms to hear what's happening in your lives and what that's been like for you.
Second: We have a deep bench of political talent in Minnesota, a group of leaders that are more than ready to pick up the work and carry us forward.
First: I have nearly two full years left in my term, and I plan to use every day working as hard as I can to represent your interests in the Senate and making sure your voices are heard. (Also, since I don't have to run a re-election campaign, I can focus entirely on this job right now)
This decision is not political, it is entirely personal. But it's not lost upon me that our country is in need of strong, progressive leadership - right now maybe more than ever. So there are two things on my mind...
My father is turning 95 this summer, and I'm blessed to have a large extended family of siblings and nieces and nephews. One of my great joys is to know that I get to spend more time with them, doing sleepovers and helping out from time to time when the kids need me.
When I first came to the Senate, I didn't have any grandchildren. Now, Archie and I have four - and our sons, Sam and Mason, and daughters in law, Emily and Julia, are now all living in Minneapolis so we can be together.
I wanted you to hear directly from me that I have decided not to run for reelection to the Senate in 2026. I have loved my job, and after 20 years of hard and rewarding work in the public sector, I'm ready to spend more time with my family. I want to take some time here to explain my decision (🧵)
Photo of Senator Tina Smith smiling in front of a field.
Republicans need to work with us to put a stop to this – he’s vacuuming up all this money Minnesotans were promised, but they seem fine with it because it’ll pay for big tax breaks for corporations.
Just heard from a Minnesota farmer who fronted her own money for some conservation work because USDA had a contractual agreement to reimburse her. Musk’s freeze means she’s out that money and USDA is refusing to reimburse.
If Republicans think pursuing an agenda that’s solely focused on Wall Street and big corporations is going to do anything to help make life affordable, they need a reality check that I am happy to provide.
Tax cuts for billionaires won’t boost wages. Tax cuts for billionaires won’t make housing cheaper. Tax cuts for billionaires won’t make health care cheaper. Tax cuts for billionaires won’t make groceries cheaper. Tax cuts for billionaires will not help us or our families.
We understand that big concentrations of wealth and power in this country hurt us and help billionaires like Elon Musk and his friends. They like it that way and use chaos/misinformation to distract us from their end game: Giant tax breaks for big corporations and billionaires. Follow the money.
Just confirmed with the University of St. Thomas that funding to train more special education teachers was *cancelled* because of Trump’s cuts. Why? Because Republicans are vacuuming up every dollar they can for massive corporate tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy. They don’t care who gets screwed.
Reposted byTina Smith
BREAKING: In response to our motion, the court has required CDC, FDA, and HHS to immediately restore critical health info and data that the Trump administration ordered the agencies to remove. This is a huge win for doctors, researchers, and patients.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
586 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 12Next →