Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 52
Juan Vargas
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 52
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Juan Vargas
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 52
SoupScore
Juan's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 92 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
On Veterans Day, and every day, we honor the men and women in uniform who have served this country. They are true heroes.
To our veterans in CA-52 and across the U.S. — thank you for your service, sacrifice, and commitment to defending our nation.
We are forever grateful.
I will not support a bill that fails to address the Republicans' health care crisis and the skyrocketing premiums that millions of families are facing. 3/3
Republicans have shut down the government for 41 days because they refuse to lower health care costs. In fact, they've made things even worse by trying to take food away from families. 2/3
I will be a NO on the Senate’s “deal.” 1/3
Reposted byCongressman Juan Vargas
🎉GREAT NEWS🎉
The Supreme Court just REJECTED a challenge to the landmark decision in #Obergefell that legalized same-sex marriage across the U.S., meaning marriage equality will continue to be the law of the land! #LoveIsLove
Trump is doing everything he possibly can to NOT feed families during this Republican shutdown.
Thank you for everything, Madam Speaker.
Nancy Pelosi has been one of the most consequential leaders of our time. She is a trailblazer, a force of nature, and a pillar of strength, determination, and compassion. Her progressive legislative record stands unmatched, and America is a better place because of her years of service.
Republicans just broke the record for longest shutdown.
They're refusing to meet with Democrats to open the government and address the health care crisis they created.
It's shameful, and it's time for them to come to the table and help us protect health care for millions.
Trump is choosing to take food away from families, despite being ordered to pay out SNAP funding by multiple courts. Playing politics and using hunger as a weapon like this is not only cruel, it's illegal.
Open enrollment for health care begins today, and millions of Americans could see their coverage costs skyrocket.
Health care should be affordable – that's exactly what Democrats are fighting for every day.
It's time for Republicans to come to the table.
It's Day 30 of the government shutdown.
Republican leadership canceled votes in the House in September and haven't called us back into session for a SINGLE DAY since the shutdown began.
It's past time for them need to come back and work with us to protect health care and reopen the government.
The money is there to fund SNAP next month.
The Trump Administration is CHOOSING to let families go hungry.
We are calling on the USDA and this Administration to reverse this decision and make sure 42 million people don't lose the food assistance they rely on.
Yesterday, ICE again denied our congressional oversight visit to the San Diego federal building to follow up on reports that ICE is detaining people there in inhumane conditions.
It doesn't matter how much ICE tries to stonewall us.
We're going to continue to show up and push for answers.
At the San Diego federal building again with Reps. Peters, Levin, and Jacobs to conduct oversight after reports that ICE is detaining people here in the basement in concerning conditions.
Last Monday, ICE blocked myself and Rep. Peters from entering.
Today, we’re back again to demand answers.
The Trump Administration has contingency money for SNAP. They're just choosing not to use it.
42 million Americans, including 28 million seniors, children, and people with disabilities, risk losing their food assistance in November.
Disgusting.
As members of Congress, it's our job to conduct oversight. That's what @replamonica.bsky.social was doing when she was targeted by this Administration.
We stand with Rep. McIver against these sham charges.
If nothing’s wrong, then why is ICE trying to stop us from doing our job of Congressional oversight? What are they trying to hide?
This is NOT OVER. We won’t stop showing up, demanding answers, and working to protect our communities! 3/3
We’ve heard extremely concerning reports that the number of ICE detainees in the basement of the courthouse is rising, families are having trouble getting in touch with their loved ones, and people are being held for days in spaces without real beds or showers. 2/3
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.