Juan Vargas headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 52
Born
March 7, 1961
Age 65
Phone
(202) 225-8045
Office
2467 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 52

Juan Vargas

Juan Carlos Vargas is an American businessman and politician who has been a U.S. representative for California since 2013. His district includes the southernmost portions of San Diego County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 581
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 52

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Juan Vargas headshot
Juan Vargas
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 52
SoupScore
Juan's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 95 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Congress just came together to pass the most significant bipartisan bill in decades to lower housing costs. At the last minute, Trump is refusing to sign it.
Fox News hosts are dumbfounded by Trump's refusal to sign the bipartisan housing bill: This housing bill was bipartisan. It was gonna help out young homebuyers who can't afford to buy a house right now. Is there political risk in canceling this ceremony? This is something everybody wanted.
This legislation will help us boost our housing supply, increase homeownership opportunities, and lower costs. It's a major step forward, but the fight to make sure affordable housing is within reach for families continues. We won't let up.
On June 19, 1865, enslaved people in Galveston, TX learned they were free — over two years after the Emancipation Proclamation. As we commemorate Juneteenth and the end of slavery in the United States, we recommit ourselves to the unfinished work of justice, opportunity, and equality for all.
Today marks 14 years of DACA. Dreamers strengthen our communities, contribute to our economy, and have built their lives here. As Trump continues to attack DACA, we must provide permanent protections and a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers. #HomeIsHere #ProtectDreamers
Trump's ICE has beaten, brutalized, and even murdered innocent people. Instead of demanding accountability, Republicans sent another blank check. I've been clear from the start. Not one penny more for Trump’s ICE and the Administration’s violent anti-immigrant crackdown.
SHAMEFUL: Republicans just voted to send $70 BILLION to ICE. That's on top of the $170 billion they authorized for the agency last summer. They chose to hand another $70 billion to an agency that continues to terrorize our communities with absolutely no guardrails. I voted NO.
Early this morning, the Senate voted to give ICE $70 billion more as this rogue agency continues to terrorize our communities. No reforms or changes made. The House must reject this funding. Not one penny more for Trump’s ICE.
Happy Pride! This month, as we celebrate the resilience and enormous achievements of the LGBTQI+ community, we also reaffirm our commitment to fight for justice and equality for all.
As owners of a family-owned small business and active members of the Downtown Chula Vista Association, Priscilla and Fernando work hard every day to enrich and strengthen our community. Wishing them many years of continued success!
During National Small Business Month, I was glad to honor Fernando Covarrubias and Priscilla Curiel, owners of Mujer Divina Burrito & Coffee House, as our May Constituents of the Month.
From Forbes - Juan Vargas: 'I Don't Hear A Peep' From GOP Over ICE Carrying Out Raids Without Judicial Warrants ICE is out of control. Meanwhile, Republicans are trying to send them billions more in funding with no oversight. Absolutely NO funds for this rogue agency.
Donald Trump está creando un fondo para gastos discrecionales de casi $2 BILLONES, financiado con dinero de nuestros impuestos, para sus seguidores y aliados, incluidos los insurrectos del 6 de enero quienes atacaron a agentes de policía. La corrupción está fuera de control.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
581 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CNOYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division ANOYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 12Next →