RFK Jr. and his team are both incompetent and corrupt.
They are handing scientific leadership to China while focusing on changing regulations to suit the businesses they run in the private sector.
youtu.be/93MsJdUT7FU
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 4
Jake Auchincloss
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 584
Yes43%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jake Auchincloss
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 4
SoupScore
Jake's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 86 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Should a healthcare executive be able to hire & fire his own regulators?
Meet Brad Smith, of Main Street Health—DOGE's health czar.
youtu.be/c5m1QWzIcrI
No Signal snafu necessary — RFK Jr's incompetence has always been broadcast.
www.wsj.com/opinion/rfk-...
Don't believe the voodoo accounting that MAGA is trying to foist onto the Congressional Budget Office: their tax cuts will explode the national debt.
youtu.be/7LThqQut61E
This administration has a junior varsity national security team.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEwU...
RFK Jr. is trying to run the same 'natural experiment' in Texas that he conducted in Samoa.
www.theatlantic.com/health/archi...
Attacks on science always become attacks on scientists. We know where this leads: policy made by fear or favor, not evidence.
MAGA Members of Congress remain silent while measles spreads and vaccine scientists are purged.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Massachusetts imports its swing energy. In the winter, Bay Staters are subject to global LNG spot prices, raising their heating & electricity costs. To control our energy destiny, Massachusetts needs to build more generation, particularly nuclear and offshore wind.
youtu.be/AN2h-Q0yaTo
Why on Earth a rule against giving criminals untraceable guns was challenged is beyond me, but we'll take the Ws where we can.
www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/p...
This Supreme Court ruling in favor of ghost-gun regulation will help prevent individuals who cannot legally purchase weapons from building their own firearms at home through mail-order kits.
Ms. Ozturk has no reported record of violence or harassment; she did co-write an op-ed about Israel, with which I disagree. I have written about my opposing view. That's how America works. Revoking her visa because of her political viewpoint is not how America works.
Massachusetts has been welcoming students and immigrants for four centuries. The footage I saw today of Tufts graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk being detained by masked officers is contrary to that tradition.
Republicans claim to support free & open energy markets, but their strategy of protectionism & picking losers is raising energy costs for Bay Staters and Americans everywhere.
youtu.be/nFgR3wHw6L0
It's not often that Speaker Johnson, Senate Republicans, and the Europeans agree on something.
But they agree on this: use Russia's 300 billion euros of frozen assets to fund Ukrainian defense for the next decade.
Trump refuses.
It’s not just Trump — the presidency itself has become too powerful. Congress must curb presidential emergency powers, law enforcement loopholes, tariff authorities, war-making authorizations, and more.
youtu.be/K3H1jtd3G3w
Fixing Washington requires root reforms.
- Outlaw gerrymandering & partisan primaries.
- Take back power from the presidency.
- Term limit the Supreme Court.
youtu.be/aUxNtpBfMms
There's an age-old fight in Washington between politicians' B.S. and arithmetic. Arithmetic is undefeated, and the math of MAGA Republicans doesn’t add up. Their budget resolution cuts healthcare.
This recession would be a choice.
youtu.be/U6XWx4szoq0
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History584 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
584 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.