Christopher R. Deluzio headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Pennsylvania District 17
Born
July 13, 1984
Age 41
Phone
(202) 225-2301
Office
1222 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17

Christopher R. Deluzio

Christopher Raphael Deluzio is an American politician, attorney, and former U.S. Navy officer serving as the U.S. representative for Pennsylvania's 17th congressional district since 2023. He is a member of the Democratic Party. The district encompasses most of the northwestern suburbs and exurbs of Pittsburgh, and includes the entirety of Beaver County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 583
Yes44%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 17

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Christopher R. Deluzio headshot
Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 30 sponsored · 192 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

More than 100,000 Pennsylvanians lost SNAP benefits, while giant corporations and billionaires got massive tax giveaways. Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" at work.
🚨SNAP tracker update: We just added March data for the 16 states reporting so far. The # of low-income people receiving SNAP continues to fall. Largest drops since H.R. 1 was enacted in July: AZ: -51% TN: -15% VA: -13% SC & TX: -11% CT, IN, KS, PA: -10%
The American people need to know whether any President is up to the job. I’m proud to co-sponsor @raskin.house.gov's bill to strengthen the 25th Amendment and ensure full transparency about the the fitness of this President—and all future ones.
My constituent Arjun Kapur was a passionate young man who loved this country of ours and wanted to make it even better. He will be deeply missed by his family, friends, and so many others across Western PA.
Too often, corporate power rips our teams away from the communities that love them (and build them stadiums). I'm proud to co-sponsor the Home Team Act to give communities and local investors the option to buy teams when owners try to move them away.
If you've got three commas in your net worth, I know you can afford to pay more taxes. And in no sane world should people earning a paycheck face a higher tax rate than people living off investment returns.
At a time when energy bills are at historic highs, the Trump Administration wants to cut the program that helps struggling Americans pay their power bills… but they’re spending billions on a deadly and unnecessary Iran War. Ridiculous.
Our Constitution and the Fourth Amendment are not polite suggestions. Just like when Joe Biden was President, I'm ready to vote NO on reauthorizing FISA—it's given the government vast powers to invade people's privacy and spy on our communications without a warrant.
Excited for #ThePitt season finale tonight. I want to shout out the cast & crew for showing Pittsburgh so much love—and highlighting the struggles patients and healthcare workers face every day in our broken healthcare system.
Live Nation and Ticketmaster have used their power to rip off fans, venues, and artists for years. This is a big victory that shows we can win when we stand up to powerful monopolies. Now, it's time to break up Live Nation and Ticketmaster.
Music lovers who have long complained about Ticketmaster fees for concert tickets are surely reveling in a jury verdict that found its parent company Live Nation has been running a harmful monopoly over big venues.
#TaxDay is a good day to remember that "trickle down" economics is a fiscally-reckless fairy tale grift designed to plow more money to the ultra-rich and powerful at the expense of hardworking people who earn a paycheck.
Photo of Rep. Deluzio at "Tax the Rich" press conference
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
583 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12