Accidentally matching with my good friend and partner, State Senator Katie Fry Hester! As Congress looks to regulate AI and other emerging technologies, we must continue to work with our state partners who are actively delivering solutions and tackling these issues.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maryland District 3
Sarah Elfreth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 568
Yes44%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Sarah Elfreth
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaryland District 3
SoupScore
Sarah's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 99 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It is my hope that we can all carry on her spirit of generosity, understanding, and curiosity to inspire each other to achieve even more than what we thought possible.
Her lifetime of service and sage advice touched so many – myself included. I was honored to deliver brief remarks of gratitude for her life and legacy at today’s service.
Whether it was through her role as Chair of the Anne Arundel County Democratic Party Central Committee or as a lifelong member of the Anne Arundel County NAACP chapter, Ms. Davenport was an undeniable force for good in Maryland.
Christine Davenport was an educator in every sense of the word. Starting at one of the first schools allowing Black teachers, she inspired so many not only in the classroom – dedicating four decades to the Anne Arundel County Public Schools – but in the community through her advocacy & dedication.
After years of negotiation led by Maryland Department of Environment, I was proud to be part of the announcement of the agreement to continue powering Maryland while making historic investments from Constellation in water quality monitoring, a new mussel hatchery & combating invasive species.
For almost a century, the Conowingo Dam has been the largest source of renewable energy in Maryland - and also served as a regular reminder that we are all downstream of someone.
Fossil fuel industry interests that sell American energy to our foreign adversaries should not automatically come before the needs of our local communities – that’s why I spoke out against these CRAs in the Rules Committee and ultimately voted no.
Rather than addressing the real challenges to energy affordability, House Republicans would rather throw away years of collaborative efforts and constituent contributions ensuring our public lands are best supporting their communities.
This is not about energy dominance – there is nothing in today’s legislation to ensure energy produced would even benefit Americans, let alone the communities most impacted.
We must continue the fight against these reckless cuts because they are not just an attack on our expert researchers and scientists, but on all of our health care.
So it boggles the mind and insults our nation’s values that President Trump and DOGE canceled the grants for 383 clinical trials, including more than 100 grants for cancer research, through the National Institutes of Health.
Nearly every American family has been touched by cancer - mine included. Fortunately, the federal government’s near-century of investment in cancer research and clinical trials has resulted in life-saving treatments for millions – again, my family included.
However, nearly 300,000 Marylanders will see changes in their Medicaid starting January 2027. For more details on whether new Medicaid rules may apply to you, check out the link below:
Is my Medicaid going to change? With President Trump’s Big Ugly Law, many Marylanders are finding themselves asking this question. For most of the 1.5 million Marylanders who rely on Medicaid for coverage, their care will not be impacted.
I signed onto the discharge petition to force this vote back in September, and today I’ll be voting for transparency and accountability. If there’s nothing to hide, release the files.
Today, the House of Representatives will finally vote to release the Epstein files. This is a long overdue step toward ensuring the survivors get the justice they deserve and the American people get the truth they deserve.
That’s why I’ve joined @repbarragan.bsky.social in introducing legislation to stop these unlawful electricity price hikes.
But instead of lowering costs for the American people as he promised, President Trump cancelled more than 300 clean energy projects in blue states, playing political games that will raise energy costs even higher for hardworking families.
Our country is in the midst of an affordability crisis – more than half of Americans live paycheck to paycheck while health care, housing, child care, and energy bills pile up.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History568 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
568 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.