🙋🏻♀️ I’m here - as are all House Democrats - ready to pass a 1 month funding extension that’s **actually** clean and doesn’t cut veterans health care, drive up housing costs, or fire Social Security workers.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 51
Sara Jacobs
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 535
Yes40%
No59%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 51
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sara Jacobs
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 51
SoupScore
Sara's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 136 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump is on a mission to (illegally!) eliminate the Department of Education – and he just started by cutting its staff in half. This is a betrayal of students, parents, and educators.
I just went there myself, so I’ll save you the trouble: it can’t be justified.
Officials are reconsidering whether the optics of flying a handful of migrants to Guantánamo Bay aboard military aircrafts really justify the price. www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-botch...
Let’s be clear, this has nothing to do with protecting Jewish students and everything to do with Republicans long term plan to defund higher education. Don’t fall for it.
Reposted byCongresswoman Sara Jacobs
Guantanamo Bay troops guard empty migrant tents, suffer low morale, Rep Sara Jacobs told me after a bipartisan CODEL to the base
“All of us had a lot of questions about the money, how few immigrants were actually there, in regards to how much money is being spent" www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol...
The U.S. is one of the biggest suppliers of weapons to the UAE – but we shouldn’t be supporting them when they’re actively funding a genocide by arming the RSF in Sudan.
That’s why @vanhollen.senate.gov and I led a bill to block U.S. arms to the UAE until they stop arming the RSF.
Hearing about a government shutdown? Here's what's going on and why I'm voting no on this partisan bill.
This stop-gap funding measure does NOTHING to hold Elon Musk or President Trump accountable. Instead, it STEALS FROM YOU in order to FUND BILLIONAIRES’ TAX BREAKS. I’m voting no.
TL;DR: What does the U.S. need? More housing. What’s needed to build housing? Steel and aluminum. Where do we get a lot of it from? Canada.
What did Trump just raise massive 50% import taxes on? Steel and aluminum from Canada.
We can't afford this pointless trade war.
I visited the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay where Trump is housing immigrants en route to deportation.
My biggest takeaway: the cost and cruelty are unjustifiable.
There’s no added operational value; Trump just likes the optics.
I just went to the immigration detention center at Guantanamo Bay. Thousands of service members are guarding empty tents, there are fewer than 4 dozen immigrants there, and they have to import all supplies except for water and power. This isn’t worth the cost or the cruelty.
If they can target Mahmoud Khalil’s First Amendment rights, they can target yours. The whole point of the First Amendment is that it protects speech – even if it’s unpopular or you don’t like what they have to say.
During any major weather event or natural disaster, accurate information is critical for saving lives and protecting property. DOGE’s frantic cuts to important federal agencies like NOAA and FEMA put people at risk.
In Trump’s speech to Congress, he didn’t say “Medicaid” once.
But he backed a budget that forces at least $1.5 trillion in cuts – and the math doesn’t work without BIG cuts to Medicaid and Medicare.
Trump is trying to HIDE this. Don’t let him. Share this.
Major whiplash. Trump’s 25% tariffs against Mexico and Canada just kicked in on Tuesday. Now, he’s reversing course – but only for one month.
These sweeping, nonstrategic tariffs were always a bad idea because YOU pay the cost. All of this uncertainty and chaos isn’t any better.
Me waiting for Republicans to explain how exactly they’re going to cut at least $1.5 trillion from the budget without touching Medicaid:
DOGE is coming for veterans next. Firing 70,000 employees at the VA could lead to bigger delays for medical care, disability claims processing, and reaching someone at the Veterans Crisis Line.
Plus, 27% of VA staff are veterans themselves.
Republicans control every branch of government. If the government shuts down next week because they can’t get their own members in line, that’s on them.
Who actually pays for Trump’s 25% tariffs against Mexico and Canada? American companies and American consumers. I’ve talked with small businesses in San Diego and it’s clear no one can afford this.
Peter Marocco, the man put in charge by President Trump to oversee U.S. foreign assistance, including democracy assistance programs, wouldn’t answer if he was at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021 trying to violently overthrow a free and fair election.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History535 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
535 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11