Ro Khanna headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 17
Born
September 13, 1976
Age 49
Phone
(202) 225-2631
Office
306 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 17

Ro Khanna

Rohit Khanna is an American politician and lawyer serving as the U.S. representative from California's 17th congressional district since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, he defeated eight-term incumbent Democratic representative Mike Honda in the general election on November 8, 2016, after first running for the same seat in 2014. Khanna also served as the deputy assistant secretary in the United States Department of Commerce under President Barack Obama from August 8, 2009, to August 2011. Khanna endorsed Bernie Sanders for President of the United States in 2016. In 2020, Khanna co-chaired the Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 17

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Ro Khanna headshot
Ro Khanna
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 17
SoupScore
Ro's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 40 sponsored · 170 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

One common concern I have heard from constituents all week who have flooded my inbox is about fraud, waste, and abuse in Sacramento. I hear you.
I can't tell you how dismissive it is to survivors when people like Mr. Khardori make insensitive comments like this. Please let him know what you think.
These comments are a slap in the face to survivors. An email released already shows 10 co-conspirators, the survivors have named powerful men who abused them in FBI interviews that haven't been released, and there are prosecution memos that haven't been released.
An advocate for survivors sent this to me with utter disgust. I have never heard of Ankush Khardori. He had the gall to say tonight that ⁦Rep.Thomas Massie & I, 427 Congress members, and 100 Senators are wasting America's time because there is no cover-up.
Peter Thiel is leaving California if we pass a 1% tax on billionaires for 5 years to pay for healthcare for the working class facing steep Medicaid cuts. I echo what FDR said with sarcasm of economic royalists when they threatened to leave, "I will miss them very much."
What a novel idea to put country before party. Rep. Thomas Massie & I want a new beginning this Christmas that protects young girls and holds these disgusting men accountable. Merry Christmas!
This is impacting my district on Christmas Eve. PG&E is focused on investor profits over California residents. They have paid off Sacramento politicians. It's time to make it a customer owned utility.
Rep. Thomas Massie & I will continue to keep the pressure on. After we said we are bringing contempt, the DOJ is now finding millions more documents to release. They need to release the 302 FBI statements & the emails on Epstein's computer. The Epstein class must go.
I heard my favorite carol Joy to the World today. "He rules the world with truth and grace And makes the nations prove The glories of His righteousness." I wish for a more moral America. Merry Christmas.
“There are no more files, case closed.” Six months later after Rep. Massie & my Epstein Transparency Act. “There are a million files.”
The files released because of Rep. Massie & my law reference “10 co-conspirators.” The redactions protect powerful men who abused working-class girls or covered it up. The full release must include the FBI witness interviews where these men are named. @jenpsaki.bsky.social
It's not just about mouthing the words affordability. We need: - billionaire taxes - $10/day childcare - Medicare for All - a living wage - stop Wall Street from buying homes - free public college and trade schools
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11