Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 3
Teresa Leger Fernandez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes37%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Teresa Leger Fernandez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 3
SoupScore
Teresa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 63 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Is your local supermarket at risk of closing thanks to Trump’s SNAP cuts? Read this article and check out the map by Source NM here:
sourcenm.com/2025/09/05/b...
WATCH: The Forest Service Chief just refused to commit to using funds Congress gave his agency to prepare for wildfires across the west and Indian Country.
People's safety, homes, and livelihoods are on the line.
We can't allow Trump to play policial games with wildfires.
🚨 The Supreme Court just put all Latinos in the United States at risk—including citizens.
Now, this decision practically forces Latinos to carry their passports every day — as if being Latino in this country were a crime.
What does this mean for our communities?
Parents handcuffed in front of their children, street vendors taken to jails like criminals, workers interrogated because their driver’s license is “not enough.”
Today, the Supreme Court opened the door to a world where simply looking Latino, speaking Spanish, or working a humble job is enough for armed agents to detain you, throw you to the ground, and demand “proof” that you are a citizen.
🚨 The Supreme Court just put all Latinos in the United States at risk. The government must protect all its people — not condemn millions of Latinos to live in fear in the country in which they are citizens, some for decades.
Ahora, esta decisión casi obliga a los latinos a cargar su pasaporte todos los días, como si ser latino en este país fuera un crimen.
¿Qué significa para nuestras comunidades?
Padres esposados en frente de sus hijos, vendedores ambulantes llevados a cárceles como criminales, trabajadores interrogados porque su licencia de manejar “no es suficiente”.
Hoy, la Corte Suprema abrió la puerta a un mundo donde basta con parecer latino, hablar español o trabajar un empleo humilde para que agentes armados te detengan, te tiren al suelo y te exijan “pruebas” de que eres ciudadano.
🚨 La Corte Suprema acaba de poner en riesgo a todos los latinos en Estados Unidos.
El gobierno debe proteger a toda su gente — no condenar a millones de latinos a vivir con miedo en el país donde son ciudadanos, algunos por décadas.
Reminder: If your flight gets delayed, your bag goes missing, or you get stuck overnight — Trump just made sure the airline doesn’t owe you a dime.
Once again, the guy who promised to make our country more affordable is siding with big corporations instead of consumers who pay the price.
So many Americans hoped Trump would make life more affordable…
But the economy just keeps getting worse.
Jobs shouldn’t be a partisan issue. Trump needs to stop catering to his rich buddies and big corporations so we can help people who are taking food out of their grocery carts.
Trump’s VA is ripping abortion care away from our veterans.
If they are willing to rip away freedoms from veterans who sacrificed everything for ours, who’s safe?
This fight isn’t just about Epstein— it’s about ending the abuse of women and girls in America.
It’s about breaking the systems of power that protect abusers and pedophiles.
The survivors fight for every victim, we fight alongside them.
We all understood you, @lujan.senate.gov.
I wonder if Secretary Kennedy needs some help understanding plain English and that’s why he still hasn’t replied to our letters about protecting rural hospitals? 🤔
We asked, you delivered. Keep sending your new names in—apparently Trump needs them!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.