It's yet another example of how this Administration doesn't give a crap about worker safety, or the hardworking public servants—including some of my constituents—who do important work to keep us all safe. (2/2) www.wtae.com/article/pitt...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17
Christopher R. Deluzio
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 17
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This week, the White House fired 400 staff at a research facility in Pleasant Hills who work on worker safety—specifically mine safety and testing respirators for painting, construction, and more. (1/2)
Join me for my Social Security and Healthcare Telephone Town Hall on Wednesday, April 9th at 6pm.
Sign up here to get a call (2/2)
My office has gotten hundreds of calls about the recent efforts in Washington to attack our Social Security & healthcare. And it was a hot topic at my last in-person town hall.
So let’s keep the conversation going as I continue to take a stand against any cuts to these hard-earned benefits. (1/2)
Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) are corporate middlemen. They steer patients toward chain pharmacies, jack up prescription prices for all of us, and put independent, local pharmacies out of business.
Unbelievable that this Administration is letting PBMs off the hook to keep up their grift.
I’m fighting to protect Social Security & our hard-earned right to retire with dignity. To help me fight back, please take a minute to fill out my short survey: deluzio.house.gov/survey425
Folks are struggling with grocery costs, food banks are hurting, and farmers are having a harder and harder time keeping their heads above water. And this Administration is slashing emergency food programs?!
Costs are still way too high. And yet…the Trump Admin is messing with Social Security & VA and targeting health care cuts. All so they can funnel more $$$ to tax giveaways for corporations and the ultra rich.
...Or, we can patriotically stand up to the powerful corporations and robber barons making life miserable, and finally get back on track to restore the American Dream.
I know which side I'm on. (2/2)
Our great country is at a turning point. The way I see it, we've got two choices.
We can stick with the same old wimpy politics of catering to the corruption and corporate power—all while hardworking people get more and more pissed about being ripped off... (1/2)
We're standing our ground to protect Social Security, and the pressure is making a difference. I will keep standing strong against this Admin and any attempt to rip away the earned benefits people count on to live with dignity.
www.axios.com/2025/03/26/s...
Corporate power isn't just screwing over hardworking people with higher prices—it's corrupting our entire system. It's swampy nonsense that needs to end if we're gonna restore the American Dream.
This is what you get when you hand our government over to robber barons: they cannot imagine what it's like to be a senior who counts on Social Security to pay their bills.
These villains need to keep their hands off Social Security.
Here's a reality check: egg production is only down 3-5% due to bird flu, but big egg corporations are raking in profits 3-6X higher than before avian flu hit. We need federal action to take on this corporate power. (2/2)
Folks are seeing these signs in stores and are paying an arm & a leg for a carton of eggs. Big egg producers want you to think that an 'Act of God' has made the egg supply plummet, and they have no choice but to raise prices... (1/2)
In Western PA we know workers' rights are sacred and part of the American Dream.
Now is the time for solidarity.
President Trump is trying to gut the rights of over a million federal workers in the American Federation of Government Employees who keep our government running.
He's trying to strip away labor rights that we’ve cherished in America for more than a century.
I'm proud to stand with postal workers as we fight to protect & improve the core public service that only the Postal Service can provide. Guys like me won't sit back & let this Administration privatize USPS as part of their plot to plunder our gvmt + funnel our $$ to giant corporations. #ProtectUSPS
The American Dream has been ripped away and life is too expensive for hardworking people.
It didn't just happen: politicians carrying water for corporate power run amok helped it along.
Let's fight this corruption without apology.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11