Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8
Mark Harris
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
He whiffed on Doctor Dolittle, as which of us doesn't? Anyway, you can all have your annual sulk about how he doesn't do those lists himself. (He does those lists himself.)
I met Barack Obama in 2007 at a small event when his run for president was just starting. He asked me what I was working on. I said, a book about the 5 1967 Best Picture nominees. He said, quickly, "So...Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, Guess Who's Coming To Dinner, In the Heat of the Night..." >
I confess don't entirely get the Del Toro passion--it feels a little too much like a vibes pick--but I'm very impressed that the "It's time for him to have an Oscar!" campaign around him has made everyone forget that he has one. (Don't come for me, everyone--I think he's good in the movie.)
I've honestly heard more excitement about Lindo's and Mosaku's performances, and if they're struggling for slots, which they seem to be, I have trouble believing that Jordan's place is rock-solid. Maybe the movie surges and all three get in. I'll be curious what SAG does.
I feel the same way about Hawke--I think he could make a real run for it but he has to get nominated first!
Totally true. The precedent is Daniel Kaluuya's nomination for Get Out, and I certainly think Jordan could get in. I'm just seeing a lot of people treat him as the default #3, and that feels overconfident to me.
I think if you assume DiCaprio and Chalamet are in, then you're left with three spots and four guys: Ethan Hawke, Wagner Moura, Joel Edgerton, and Jordan. I would still predict Jordan gets in right now, but there is a lot of passion for each of the others.
You'd have to ask Rebecca Miller (who successfully got Apple TV to go for five hours, not two) but I doubt it. Glad you enjoyed it! I think it's amazing and was so happy to be able to contribute a couple of moments.
All good!
Need some distraction? Here are two random Oscar predictions.
1) If three foreign movies get Best Picture nominations this year, which is very possible, the Academy's old guard will start arguing that they should be ineligible.
2) The Michael B. Jordan Best Actor nomination is shakier than it looks.
Also, I've lived through too many elections in which Dems who think they're tough-minded pragmatists use "It's the economy, stupid" as code for "Stop all your petty identity-based whining or we'll cut you loose" not to treat it warily. We win when we provide a big vision that INCLUDES the economy.
You're arguing as if I just said the economy's good. I didn't, and anyone who walks down a NYC street will tell you this city is no bubble. But when Democrats get into the head that their voters only care about one thing, they sound condescending, and they screw up. Also, it's simply not true. >
You can't plan to make "the economy sucks" your main argument three years in advance.
"We are going to reverse every renaming, pull down the gold leaf, and rebuild the East Wing" should not be the Democrats' main 2028 plank, but there are worse things to run on. It's one of those visuals you can actually start executing in Week One. Do it, put it on TV, rub it in, hurt some feelings.
Reposted byMark Harris
Statement from the NYT, which is useful context, but still feel like you gotta mention it in the column!
I agree. Either he didn't disclose it to his editors either and this is a colossal violation of conflict-of-interest rules, or he did, in which case someone has a monumental amount of explaining to do.
Any Democrat who thinks it's appropriate to "find common ground" with the Republicans on issues like high school sports teams is negotiating with a political party that does not believe trans people should exist. This policy will kill people, so maybe stop wringing your hands about volleyball.
I read this in disbelief, read it a second time in disbelief, read it a third time and realized he's British.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History551 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
551 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.