Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

You could try James Ivory's adaptation of E.M. Forster's long-unpublished gay novel Maurice, or if you can find it, "Killing All the Right People," the AIDS episode of the sitcom Designing Women.
This is LGBTQ+ History Month, and I urge my followers who are LGBTQ+ (or just curious) to dive into one thing--a movie, novel, TV show--from your childhood or before. Look at an older gay work as something other than a relic or an error. You'll be rewarded. Your world, your SELF, will get bigger. >
This is apropos of a thread about what publications lose when they lose older culture writers and only have young ones. All I'll say about that is that learning about cultural history is a lifetime's work, and if you do this for a living, there's no shame in not knowing, only in not trying to learn.
This was not a dumb question. It's not as if he'd ever been taught this in school. He knew vaguely what Stonewall was and even though he had put things together incorrectly, he was at least trying to put things together and asking good questions. Anyway, now I know who I'm writing the book for. >
As some of you know, for 4 years I've been working on a book about the last 80 years of popular culture as a flashpoint for the gay rights struggle. Sometimes I've wondered who it's for. Then yesterday a young gay man, maybe 23, asked me if Stonewall happened because everyone was in NYC for Pride. >
An important thing that is often ignored about Mamdani: he's cheerful! Taking the city's (and country's) problems seriously doesn't have to mean projecting nothing but darkness and rage. His positive vibe is an unbelievably effective way to make the tent bigger. As is fun/dorky stuff like this.
New York City, I can see a future with you. And it’s one we can afford. Our new ad just aired during The Golden Bachelor.
"Too."
MADELEINE DEAN: The president is unhinged. He's unwell JOHNSON: A lot of folks on your side are too D: Oh my god, please. That performance in front of the generals? J: I didn't see it D: It's so dangerous! Our allies are looking elsewhere. Our enemies are laughing. You have a POTUS who's unwell.
Democrats will have a lot of work to do to counter the casual, faux-folksy fluency with which Vance lies. He's not like Trump, veering and babbling and stumbling and digressing. He just freestyles his evil bullshit with a mechanical grin, unslakable ambition, and the utter absence of a moral core.
Asked about an A.I.-generated meme Trump posted on his social media account earlier this week depicting Representative Hakeem Jeffries, the House minority leader, with a fake mustache and a sombrero, Vance dismissed it as the president “joking” and said they’re “having a good time.”

Confronted with the fact that Jeffries called it racist, Vance said he didn’t “even know what that means.”
Tonight on a NY1 interview, Andrew Cuomo described Zohran Mamdani as "an existential threat" to New Yorkers and the Democratic Party. I can't say strongly enough that this is despicable, dangerous, irresponsible language. I've never held Cuomo in high esteem; let this election be his banishment.
George Clooney is dead-on in a role that only a George Clooney-sized star could play, Adam Sandler is back in his stealth-great-actor mode, and Billy Crudup does his thing, which is to say he comes in for ten minutes and almost makes off with the whole movie. And Laura Dern! And STACY KEACH! See it.
I feel like we're already in a fourth wave of counter-counter-counterreactions to Noah Baumbach's new movie Jay Kelly. I unreservedly loved it. It starts as a warmhearted portrait of a movie star but winds up being a startlingly unsentimental look at reaping what you sow in late middle age. >
Niedermeyer lives.
Hegseth: "It all starts with physical fitness and appearance. If the secretary of war can do regular hard PT, so can every member of our joint force. Frankly, it's tiring to look out at combat formations and see fat troops. Likewise, it's completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals."
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 12Next →