Reposted byMike Levin
I voted twice in Congress to make independent redistricting the law of the land nationwide, but I’m voting YES on Prop 50.
Here’s why:
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byMike Levin
Just a reminder that Trump accepted a $400M jet from Qatar, now being upgraded for hundreds of millions more by U.S. taxpayers, to eventually be transferred to his presidential library.
Just a reminder that Trump accepted a $400M jet from Qatar, now being upgraded for hundreds of millions more by U.S. taxpayers, to eventually be transferred to his presidential library.
Reposted byMike Levin
Having watched a lot of SpongeBob with my kids, I never expected Republicans to run Congress like the Krusty Krab.
Ten days into their government shutdown, they still refuse to engage in any negotiations to keep health insurance premiums affordable for millions of Americans.
Having watched a lot of SpongeBob with my kids, I never expected Republicans to run Congress like the Krusty Krab.
Ten days into their government shutdown, they still refuse to engage in any negotiations to keep health insurance premiums affordable for millions of Americans.
I voted twice in Congress to make independent redistricting the law of the land nationwide, but I’m voting YES on Prop 50.
Here’s why:
Trump claims wind and solar drives up costs, but the data from his own administration shows otherwise.
States that rely more on renewables actually have lower electricity bills.
Clean energy isn’t the problem—it’s a big part of the solution to cheaper power. www.politico.com/news/2025/10...
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump just said some federal employees “don’t deserve to be taken care of.” That’s not leadership, it’s cruelty.
Hundreds of thousands of Americans are working or waiting without pay, and the president seems proud of it.
We need a leader who reopens government, not one who weaponizes it.
Trump just said some federal employees “don’t deserve to be taken care of.” That’s not leadership, it’s cruelty.
Hundreds of thousands of Americans are working or waiting without pay, and the president seems proud of it.
We need a leader who reopens government, not one who weaponizes it.
Reposted byMike Levin
Imagine opening a letter saying your health insurance costs are about to rise by thousands, even tens of thousands, next year.
That’s the reality for millions of Americans later this month if we don’t extend ACA tax credits.
I won’t stand by while people are priced out of the care they need.
Imagine opening a letter saying your health insurance costs are about to rise by thousands, even tens of thousands, next year.
That’s the reality for millions of Americans later this month if we don’t extend ACA tax credits.
I won’t stand by while people are priced out of the care they need.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Johnson is delaying Democrat Adelita Grijalva’s swearing in to block a House vote to release the Epstein files.
Republicans swore in their own winners the next day in April.
This is rank hypocrisy and totally shameless.
Listen to this Republican military spouse, who is exactly right: Mike Johnson could call us all back today to DC to make sure at least our military is paid during the shutdown.
We have a bipartisan bill to do exactly that.
Truly a disgrace Johnson won’t do it.
Mike Johnson is delaying Democrat Adelita Grijalva’s swearing in to block a House vote to release the Epstein files.
Republicans swore in their own winners the next day in April.
This is rank hypocrisy and totally shameless.
The new DOE “climate review” is one of the most misleading and irresponsible government reports I’ve ever seen. It cherry-picks, distorts, and ignores decades of peer-reviewed science. Using it to justify gutting climate rules isn’t just wrong — it’s unconscionable. www.politico.com/interactives...
Reposted byMike Levin
It is truly disgraceful that Johnson refuses to bring House Republicans back to DC or swear in our new Democratic colleague, Adelita Grijalva, because she would be the 218th and deciding signature on the Epstein Files resolution.
All during a government shutdown with real world consequences and the health care of millions of Americans at stake. Johnson should be ashamed of himself.
It is truly disgraceful that Johnson refuses to bring House Republicans back to DC or swear in our new Democratic colleague, Adelita Grijalva, because she would be the 218th and deciding signature on the Epstein Files resolution.
Reposted byMike Levin
Millions of Americans are about to see their health care premiums double, and the government is shut down because Republicans walked away.
Democrats are ready to work and reopen the government.
It’s time for House Republicans to end their vacation and do their jobs.
Millions of Americans are about to see their health care premiums double, and the government is shut down because Republicans walked away.
Democrats are ready to work and reopen the government.
It’s time for House Republicans to end their vacation and do their jobs.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.