Republicans just proposed using ONE BILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS to fund Donald Trump’s latest vanity project. This is a gross misuse of Americans’ hard-earned money and shows that Trump was lying when he claimed “not one cent” of taxpayer dollars would be used for his ballroom.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 150 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As threats to our environment, our public lands, our clean air and water protections continue, I am proud to be fighting alongside @nylcv.bsky.social to protect our environment and secure a greener future for generations to come.
@nylcv.bsky.social's tireless advocacy has helped deliver transformational policies—from The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act to congestion pricing—that set New York on a path to 100% clean energy, reduced air pollution, and improved everyday life for New Yorkers.
Last night I was honored to receive the Environmental Champion Award from the New York League of Conservation Voters.
The EEOC’s mission is to enforce the law impartially and protect every worker from discrimination, not become a tool to further harm the very workers it was created to protect.
www.nytimes.com/2026/04/27/u...
The EEOC must remain an independent civil rights watchdog—not a tool for targeting communities with “reverse DEI” probes and demanding universities provide Nazi-style lists of Jewish staff members.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission cannot be weaponized to serve Trump’s agenda. We are witnessing a disturbing push to legitimize discrimination, ignore credible claims, and undermine real enforcement for vulnerable workers.
By restricting the mailing of this vital drug, a radical judge stripped away one of the few lifelines left for women across the country living in health care deserts and states that restrict access to abortion.
apnews.com/article/abor...
Women’s health and bodily autonomy are under attack.
A right-wing judge appointed by Donald Trump just ruled to restrict access to safe abortions. 2 out of 3 abortions in the United States are made possible by the FDA-approved, safe and clinically effective drug mifepristone.
Donald Trump and Sean Duffy have no legal basis to stand on—I look forward to seeing them fail in court, again.
www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news...
The Trump administration is trying in vain, once again, to make life harder for New Yorkers by targeting congestion pricing in court. Congestion pricing has reduced emissions, increased MTA revenue, and improved daily commutes for New Yorkers by cutting down time spent in traffic.
This legislation rips food off the table of millions of vulnerable Americans and worsens the Republican-led affordability crisis.
I voted NO on this horrible bill.
While Americans are struggling to meet their basic needs due to skyrocketing costs at the grocery store, gas pump, and doctor's office, Republicans crafted a Farm bill that locks in $187 Billion dollars in SNAP cuts.
Congress must strike the right balance between protecting national security and protecting Americans’ civil liberties as warranted by the Fourth Amendment. That balance does not exist within the current FISA Section 702, and therefore, I voted NO on this bill.
FISA Section 702 must be reformed to require a probable cause warrant for intelligence agencies to search through Americans’ personal information held in the 702 database. This bill is woefully insufficient because it lacks that requirement.
Additionally, Congress must reform the Supreme Court to bring balance back to a court that has skewed so far to the right in recent years that it has lost sight of its fundamental mission to provide equal justice under the law.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Now more than ever, Congress must pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to protect all Americans' fundamental right to vote in free and fair elections.
Today's SCOTUS decision eviscerates the Voting Rights Act in ways that should send shivers down the spine of American democracy. In this verdict, the Court bowed to the wishes of MAGA Republicans and gutted the Voting Rights Act – opening the door for the disenfranchisement of millions of Americans.
TPS holders support 390,000 U.S. citizen children and contributed $29 billion annually to the U.S. economy. Ending TPS would be senseless cruelty—tearing families apart and weakening communities across the country.
#ProtectTPS @hispaniccaucus.bsky.social
I am proud to introduce the PROTECT Act to stop Donald Trump from using taxpayer-funded buildings for his personal vanity projects, because New Yorkers deserve public spaces that they can respect, not monuments to tyranny and corruption.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11