Jason Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Missouri District 8
Born
June 16, 1980
Age 46
Phone
(202) 225-4404
Office
1011 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Missouri District 8

Jason Smith

Jason Thomas Smith is an American businessman and politician who has been the U.S. representative for Missouri's 8th congressional district since 2013. The district comprises 30 counties, covering just under 20,000 square miles of southeastern and southern Missouri.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 586
Yes78%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jason Smith headshot
Jason Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanMissouri District 8
SoupScore
Jason's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 7 sponsored · 8 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Late Friday, the CFPB quietly gutted the protections I fought to put in place for families exploited by predatory contracts for deed. Vought called it a “compliance burden” — I’d like to know how letting unscrupulous sellers exploit people just trying to buy their own home is a “compliance burden.”
Putting a FedEx executive in charge of its competitor, the Postal Service, is exactly the kind of corrupt move we’ve come to expect from this Administration. I was glad DeJoy left, but this guy seems hand-picked to gut USPS.
FedEx donated $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund. Now, a FedEx board member has been named postmaster general.
Reposted byTina Smith
When Trump took office, there was a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, hostages were being released, and aid was getting into Gaza. Now, none of that is true. The blockage of aid is causing a humanitarian crisis in Gaza and Israel is readying a long-term occupation of the Strip.
Reposted byTina Smith
This is a great illustration of why wholly unqualified extremists shouldn't be running essential government agencies.
MURRAY: It was due last week. By law. PATEL: I understand. MURRAY: You're not gonna follow the law? ... And you have no timeline? PATEL: No MURRAY: Hmm. We're not having a budget hearing without a budget request. So where is it?
A joyous day for Catholics across the globe, but especially those here in the United States who are seeing the first American Pope. I’m hopeful that Pope Leo XIV can continue the legacy of Pope Francis by encouraging selflessness, humility and service to the world’s poorest and most marginalized.
Making it harder for sick people to receive health care saves money... by keeping people sick. If they can't afford to go to the doctor, we don't have to pay for it. That's R's logic. Reality check: Cutting coverage doesn't cut sickness.
R's: We're going to cut Medicaid D's: People will lose their health insurance. R's: Liars! CBO: Actually, yeah, people will. A lot of people, in fact. Millions.
GOP Plans To Cut Medicaid Would Kick Millions Off Health Insurance, New Analysis Says

An authoritative analysis by Congressional Budget Office is House Speaker Mike Johnson's latest headache.

By Arthur Delaney
Reposted byTina Smith
One of the 100K+ people who lost their health insurance when Missouri slashed Medicaid in 2005 was a woman working a $6.70/hour McDonald’s job. Her ~$300/week pay put her over the stricter income limits despite supporting 3 kids. Now, congressional GOP are considering cuts that could be bigger...
If Congress cuts $880 billion from Medicaid, Missouri could face a yearly shortfall of $2 billion. An early 2000s budget gap of about $2.4 billion prompted the state to drop 100,000 people from Medicaid. kffhealthnews.org/news/article...
I’m prepared to fight with every tool at my disposal to stop this effort and to protect the Boundary Waters for future generations.
By including this language in their big budget bill, they have made it clear they don’t care about the science or the data, which shows unequivocally that this type of mining poses an unacceptable risk.
Republicans in Congress are trying to give a foreign conglomerate full permission to build a copper-nickel sulfide mine right on the doorstep of the Boundary Waters watershed and irreversibly pollute this pristine wilderness.
NEW LEGISLATION RISKS IRREVERSIBLE POLLUTION OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS 


House Republican legislation includes language to sell out the Boundary Waters to a foreign mining conglomerate
Energy Star has saved *half a trillion dollars* since it started, so this is only going to make you pay more for energy – and they know that. They know this will raise your costs, but it helps their buddies in the oil and gas industry, who donate big money to their campaigns.
Reposted byTina Smith
"I've been working on Social Security for 50 years. It's gone through wars and pandemics. It has never seen a threat like Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Frank Bisignano, the nominee to be commissioner. There's never been a more important time to speak up." - Nancy Altman
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
586 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 12Next →