…fired Aliquippa mill workers attempting to organize under the recently-passed Wagner Act. The court ordered their reinstatement and established workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. We're still fighting dirty union busters today, and we stand on these brave workers' shoulders. (2/2)

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17
Christopher R. Deluzio
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 17
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 180 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today, we mark a great day in Western PA's history—when Aliquippa Steelworkers won their fight at the U.S. Supreme Court in 1937.
In their decision, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Wagner Act in the @nlrbgov.bsky.social’s
case against J&L Steel Corp, which illegally… (1/2)
My colleagues and I are calling for answers and investigation into the Trump tariff reversal this week: if there was illegal insider trading, we've got to find out.
Who knew about the President's tariff policy change before the public, and did they use that information to trade on the stock market?
It is corrupt to profit off insider info you learn in office.
I’ve heard seniors’ concerns about difficulty verifying identity and logging into Social Security online systems. I’m very concerned about if folks are having trouble and why it’s happening. Are you having the same issues? Please let me know: deluzio.house.gov/services/hel...
Who here likes paying bank overdraft fees? Anyone? 🦗
Then why would House Republicans pass a bill yesterday to overturn a rule that capped these fees at $5?
It's simple: they want to make it easier for their bank buddies to take more money from you.
This Administration’s firings at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) will make life more dangerous for all of us. Slashing these programs will hurt mine safety, respirator certifications, and even the firefighter cancer registry and 9/11 first responder programs.
Pres. Trump & R's in Congress are already starting trade wars & driving up costs for people.
Now, their budget would pillage our government & target peoples' healthcare—all to gift $7 billion in tax giveaways to huge corporations & billionaires.
It's a cruel, fiscally reckless grift. I voted 'no.'
Today, House Republicans are passing a bill that could kick off the voter rolls millions of American women who changed their names when they got married.
They won’t have my vote—I’m a NO.
Sorry for any inconvenience. We will share more info in the future about rescheduling. Always feel free to call our office at 412-344-5583 to share your opinions with the Congressman on Social Security, healthcare, or anything else. Thank you & we look forward to rescheduling this event soon. (2/2)
An update from Team Deluzio: Unfortunately, due to Congressional leadership changing the vote schedule last-minute, Congressman Deluzio will be voting on the floor of the House of Reps at 6pm, when the telephone town hall was supposed to take place. We have to postpone tonight’s event. (1/2)
I'm proud to stand with @jayapal.house.gov, @pkryan.bsky.social, @repangiecraig.bsky.social, and others to smash monopolies and move us toward a pro-consumer, pro-small business, pro-worker economic agenda.
Watch here: www.youtube.com/live/Gr5TZUA...
Powerful corporations are crushing competition, killing small businesses, and ripping people off, then using that power to corrupt our government.
We're announcing the new Monopoly Busters Caucus to restore good old fashioned competition to our economy and pave a path back to the American Dream.
Reposted byCongressman Chris Deluzio
LIVE: I'm launching the brand new Congressional Monopoly Busters Caucus with @deluzio.house.gov, @pkryan.bsky.social, and @repangiecraig.bsky.social!
Tune in here ⬇️ www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr5T...
...they should have those same protections so they can provide the best public services possible.
That's why I'm proudly introducing the 'Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act' with Rep. Norcross & Sen. Hirono to require that basic union rights be available to ALL public sector workers. (2/2)
Every American should have the freedom to form and join a union where you can collectively bargain for better working conditions.
Our sanitation workers, librarians, safety inspectors, and all the public sector workers who make our society hum along... (1/2)
ICYMI, reminder that I'm holding a Telephone Town Hall while I’m in Washington on Wednesday to talk about protecting Social Security and healthcare. Sign up here by Wed at 2pm to join the call: deluzio.house.gov/live
Today, I joined public servants, leaders, and so many others rallying against the gutting of critical public services & attacks on sacred worker rights. We refuse to sit quietly as they plunder our govt—all while throwing more fiscally reckless tax handouts to powerful corporations & the ultra rich.
We have a Constitution and it means something in America.
And it absolutely means that our government cannot violate court orders and disappear a person to a foreign land and then tell a court that nothing can be done about it.
Heads up to DOGE: no amount of PR can gloss over their attempts to cut peoples' hard-earned Social Security & healthcare and steer public money back into Musk-owned companies. It's cruel, it's corrupt, and we need every tool available fighting back.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.