Pramila Jayapal headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Washington District 7
Born
September 21, 1965
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-3106
Office
2346 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 7

Pramila Jayapal

Pramila Jayapal is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative from Washington's 7th congressional district since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represents most of Seattle, as well as some suburban areas of King County. Jayapal represented the 37th legislative district in the Washington State Senate from 2015 to 2017. She is the first Indian American woman to serve in the U.S. House of Representatives. The district's first female member of Congress, she is also the first Asian American to represent Washington at the federal level.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 497
Yes35%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 7

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Pramila Jayapal headshot
Pramila Jayapal
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 7
SoupScore
Pramila's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 188 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

As a young organizer, I looked to him and his work building diverse coalitions as my inspiration for the way to build power for poor, working class and marginalized people. His legacy remains strong — and now we honor him by continuing this critical work. (2/3)
ICYMI: I asked AG Bondi if she would apologize to the Epstein survivors for the harm her DOJ has done to them. She refused — she wouldn’t even look at them. I will never stop demanding accountability and justice for these incredibly brave survivors.
A picture of Rep. Jayapal speaking with a Common Dreams headline and article text overlayed. The headline reads, "Pam Bondi Refuses to Apologize to Epstein Survivors Standing Right Behind Her During House Hearing." Additional text reads, "'Your Department of Justice initially released this list of 32 survivors’ names, with only one name redacted,” said Jayapal, who then slammed the DOJ for releasing files that not only included victims’ names but also their email and residential addresses, and even nude photographs of them."
Trump’s reckless tariffs are raising costs for families across the country — forcing people to pay a whopping $1,300 more on average for everything from tomatoes to t-shirts. These tariffs add up and they mean a paycheck doesn’t go as far as it should.
This image shows a bold, red upward arrow on a dark background with faint dollar signs. The text reads: "$1,300 The average tax increase per U.S. household because of Trump's tariffs." In the lower left corner, it says "Source: Tax Foundation."
Syria needs at least $200 billion to help aid their reconstruction, and 90% of the population is living in poverty. If the U.S. reimposes sanctions on Syria, it would be devastating to the people trying to rebuild their lives.
So many of the rich and powerful abusers in the Epstein files thought they were above the law and that they would never be caught. We will continue standing up and fighting until there is full accountability and justice.
Having the brave survivors in the room during Pam Bondi’s questioning was incredibly powerful. The DOJ has retraumatized these survivors, and I won’t stop standing with them as we push for justice and accountability.
I just sent a letter to Pam Bondi demanding that the DOJ stop spying on Members of Congress. Everyone — Independents, Republicans, and Democrats — should be outraged by this surveillance by the DOJ. It needs to stop NOW.
I, along with @raskin.house.gov & @robertgarcia.house.gov, am formally demanding AG Pam Bondi and the DOJ immediately stop spying on Members of Congress, explain why they were surveilling us, and grant us access to the fully unredacted Epstein Files. The DOJ must stop its cover-up NOW.
The humanitarian situation in Syria has long been unimaginable. But now, families are returning, hoping for security and safety under their new government. Assisting the rebuilding process in Syria not only helps the region, but is also good for U.S. national security interests.
ICYMI: I introduced my Trans Bill of Rights with @markey.senate.gov — legislation to defend trans people across this country as Republicans continue to push anti-trans rhetoric and bills. To our beloved trans community: We see you, we love you, and we will always stand with you.
The image features a gradient background transitioning from pink to blue. Text reads "Introducing the Trans Bill of Rights" with an icon of a paper and pen.
A colorful infographic titled "What is the Trans Bill of Rights?" outlines four points with icons: protections from employment and housing discrimination, equal access to medical treatment without discrimination, legal recognition of gender identity, and the right to use restrooms aligning with a person's gender identity.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-04-10H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1228 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1526 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 10Next →