Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Inflation was already around 3 percent when this administration took office, and it has stayed roughly in that range since. Holding inflation roughly steady is not the same thing as bringing prices down. Families know that.
The President says “tariff” is his favorite word. But tariffs aren’t magic. They’re paid by American consumers and businesses. They function like a hidden tax, and if you actually care about affordability, you don’t celebrate policies that raise prices while pretending they don’t.
Trump’s speech last night was built on exaggeration, finger-pointing, and inflated numbers. A year into the presidency, blaming the last guy stops being an explanation and starts sounding like an excuse, and that tone ran through the entire address.
Starve the VA of staff, let wait times grow, then claim private care is the only answer. This is privatization by neglect, and it’s pathetic. Shrinking the VA like this is a betrayal of the people who earned better.
They were pushed out, frozen out, or labeled unnecessary. Veterans do not care what word Washington uses. They care whether a doctor is available. Put together, 30,000 gone and 35,000 more on the chopping block is all part of a strategy.
It’s the latest in a pattern by this VA Secretary. Earlier this year, the VA eliminated roughly 30,000 jobs through buyouts and attrition. I called that out and the VA Secretary went after me on social media, arguing semantics. His defense was that these workers were not “fired.” Fine.
I have spoken to folks on the ground who tell me positions are going unfilled because hiring has slowed, morale is down, and clinicians are burned out. Now those vacancies are being used as proof the jobs were never needed. That is how you hollow out an institution without admitting it.
Now we learn the VA plans to cut up to 35,000 more positions. VA leadership says these are “unfilled” jobs. Many are nurses, doctors, mental health providers, and support staff.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Johnson has lost control of the House. This is the first time since the 75th Congress in 1937–1939 that four discharge petitions have succeeded.
Mike Johnson has lost control of the House. This is the first time since the 75th Congress in 1937–1939 that four discharge petitions have succeeded.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Johnson is failing the most basic test of leadership. When the president makes indefensible remarks about a murdered American couple and the Speaker of the House refuses to condemn his words—even as his fellow Republicans call them out—that tells you everything.
Mike Johnson is failing the most basic test of leadership. When the president makes indefensible remarks about a murdered American couple and the Speaker of the House refuses to condemn his words—even as his fellow Republicans call them out—that tells you everything.
Mike Johnson won’t condemn Trump because that would require a spine. This is the same “Speaker” who can’t keep his own conference in line.
SORKIN: I'm going to ask you a question you won't love. Can you speak to the president's disparaging comments about Rob Reiner? JOHNSON: Our prayers are with the Reiner family S: What about the president's comments? J: That's not the way I would have done it. I don't know what else I can say
When science is weakened, communities pay the price with higher costs, greater losses, and lives put at risk. Putting ideology over evidence is just plain stupid.
This institution helps forecast hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and heat waves. Its scientists and aircraft improve weather prediction, disaster response, aviation safety, farming, and national security.
The House now has enough signatures to force a vote on extending ACA tax credits for 3 years. Healthcare for millions of Americans’ has always been worth the fight. Mike Johnson needs to bring this to a vote, now. There is no reason for further delay.
Reposted byMike Levin
I am supporting a bill to end lifetime active service on the Supreme Court, set 18-year terms, and create regular, fair appointments. We need to lower partisan warfare, restore trust, and modernize the Court.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-10H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1228 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1526 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09H.R. 1526 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 1039 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 586 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H.R. 1491 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 11Next →