Under the Republican spending bill, millions of Americans would lose their insurance starting in January and millions more would see their health insurance premiums skyrocket.
This is not an exaggeration... (1/2)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 5
Mike Quigley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes43%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Quigley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 5
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 144 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Now more than ever, we have to show support for our transgender friends and neighbors.
I'm proud to stand with the @equality.house.gov and back the trans community🏳️⚧️
To keep rents down and make housing affordable, we must keep building. (2/2)
Really enjoyed meeting with the American Planning Association on Capitol Hill. As a member of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development, I appreciate their perspective on how we can build housing cheaper and faster. (1/2)
Starting at 10 am at the Northeast Levy Center, we’ll be providing resources for our seniors. In the midst of a potential government shutdown, we're available to help and answer any questions you may have.
We'll also have a free vaccine clinic starting at 9 am, with flu and COVID-19 shots. (2/2)
We're less than 24 HOURS AWAY from our FREE SENIOR FAIR with Chicago DFSS!🎉 (1/2)
This is the #DOGE dream realized. An incapable and ineffective government, shut down and unable to work for the American people.
Great eats at the annual Bryn Mawr Block Party this weekend! Enjoyed catching up with our Hollywood-North Park neighbors.
A con-artist calls climate change a con-job.
This man is allergic to science.
www.reuters.com/sustainabili...
Reposted byMike Quigley
Trump wants you to feel powerless. Kimmel’s reinstatement proves otherwise. Disney lost billions in value and the public pushed back.
When the people fight back, authoritarians and their enablers lose!
The president now believes Ukraine can win the war against Russia.
I appreciate this shift, but Trump has to turn those words into action. We need sanctions, aid, and accountability.
The @idph.bsky.social Immunization Committee is parting ways with federal guidelines on COVID-19 vaccines — and I agree with them wholeheartedly.
With conspiracy theorists like RFK Jr. at the federal level, I am proud of our state for standing up for science and lifesaving public health tools.
Republicans demand an extreme spending plan, Democrats propose an alternative. Democrats are willing to negotiate, while the so-called dealmaker-in-chief refuses to take a meeting.
Republicans would rather shut the government down than work together for the American people.
For the first time in nearly a century, the Chicago River is clean and ready for swimming🌊 I hope to see it used for more summer activities in the future! (2/2)
On Sunday, I joined hundreds of Chicagoans in watching the Chicago River Swim. Organized by A Long Swim charity, the river swim joins many open-water swimming events in raising money for ALS research. (1/2)
Shanah Tovah! Wishing a happy and healthy new year to the Chicago Jewish community.
May this time of renewal bring peace and happiness to you and your loved ones.
“For the fourth time, Russia marks the UN General Assembly with murder,” President Zelenskyy says. 3 killed, 30+ injured in another massive Russian attack this past weekend.
And Trump? Still calling himself a peacemaker but refusing to act. We must stand with Ukraine—fully and without hesitation.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.