Becca Balint headshot
At a Glance
Seat
At-large representative for Vermont
Born
May 4, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 225-4115
Office
1510 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Vermont at-large

Becca Balint

Rebecca A. Balint is an American politician who is a member of the United States House of Representatives from Vermont's at-large congressional district as a member of the Democratic Party. She served as a member of the Vermont Senate from Windham County from 2015 to 2023, as majority leader from 2017 to 2021, and as president pro tempore from 2021 to 2023.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 499
Yes39%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

At-Large District

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Becca Balint headshot
Becca Balint
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratVermont at-large
SoupScore
Becca's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 121 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Vermont, tomorrow is a day to get out and send a message to the Trump administration: No kings in America. There are rallies and marches happening in towns across the state to defend our democracy. I'll be in Jamaica, Burlington, and St. Albans. See you out there!
Israel’s strikes on Iran now risk an out of control regional war. Trump’s recklessness and poor diplomacy adds to the danger and precariousness of this situation. The Trump Administration must immediately work to deescalate.
The Trump administration has no plans to actually protect consumers from corporate greed and power, the entire purpose of the FTC. Instead they're using any method they can think of to continue their obsession with demonizing trans kids.
I’m so sick and tired of Republicans dehumanizing trans kids, demonizing their parents, and controlling what's happening in your doctor's appointments. All we want is kids to be able to get the health care that their parent deems necessary to keep them alive.
We're six months into Trump's campaign to detain, deport, and criminalize immigrants. Trump, Noem, and Rubio love to distort the law to justify abducting kids, families, and innocent people. They want to demoralize us. It's a psychological terror campaign meant to spread fear.
After sending in the National Guard, now Trump is sending Marines to Los Angeles to shut down all opposition to ICE. Trump wants a military police state. He is violating our right to protest, speak out against injustice, and observe law enforcement activity.
CNN: We have breaking news now from the Pentagon. CNN can now report that roughly 500 Marines are being mobilized in response to the protests in Los Angeles.
ICE descended upon immigrant communities in LA, targeting innocent people just trying to live their lives, and when ICE was met with fierce opposition Trump deployed the National Guard. This is not “going after criminals,” it’s a scary escalation meant to sow even more fear and division.
President Trump took extraordinary action on Saturday by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to quell immigration protesters in California, making rare use of federal powers and bypassing the authority of the state’s governor, Gavin Newsom.
Kilmar was mistakenly deported. The Trump admin admitted it. And yet he was locked up in El Salvador for over 11 weeks. Relieved to hear that he is back in the U.S. Today: A win for democracy. Tomorrow: we keep up the fight.
It’s indisputable that death is imminent for hundreds of thousands in Gaza and the level of starvation for children is catastrophic. The United States may not remain complicit in the face of the unimaginable suffering and dire need for aid and supplies.
NEW: With @raskin.house.gov, @keating.house.gov, @foushee.house.gov, and @balint.house.gov, I’m leading 92 members in urging the administration to ensure the immediate delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Innocent civilian lives can be saved. jayapal.house.gov/2025/06/04/j...
The Republican budget that is now in the Senate's hand’s is actually worse than we thought. 16 million people would lose their health care. Just so billionaires can pay a little less taxes. The Senate must do everything it can to stop this bill.
Trump's budget defunds Medicaid, food assistance, the NIH, the CDC, and the National Cancer Institute. As the irrepressibly cheerful Joni Ernst reminded us, that's okay, we're all going to die. Yeah, and the Trump administration is speeding it up.
Fantastic news. Rents have gone up nearly 30%, and predatory tech companies are colluding with landlords to illegally hike rent and take advantage of working people. Congress should pass my bill that bans this scam nationwide.
RealPage and over a dozen of DC's largest landlords acted as a housing cartel. They used RealPage pricing software to illegally collude and push rents even higher. This settlement is the first step in unraveling a scheme that inflated housing costs for thousands of DC renters.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
499 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-04-10H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 10Next →