11/ The President’s order doesn’t even mention California, and authorizes the use of ANY personnel, in ANY location, for ANY length of time.
This is a dangerous slippery slope that should concern Americans everywhere. If Trump is allowed to do this, any future president could as well.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Colorado District 6
Jason Crow
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 552
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 6
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jason Crow
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratColorado District 6
SoupScore
Jason's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 72 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
10/ Not only does this deployment not meet the legal criteria for California, Trump’s Executive Order is expansive and open-ended, allowing it to be used across the country.
9/ Applying the law to the facts in California:
-No invasion from a foreign nation.
-No rebellion against the U.S. government.
-No local law enforcement has said they’re unable to enforce the law.
8/ The President can call National Guard troops into Federal service when (10 USC 12406):
-Invasion by a foreign nation.
-Rebellion against our government.
-Local law enforcement is unable to enforce the law.
7/ In 1970, four protesting students were killed by the National Guard at Kent State University.
Many Americans remember this as one of the most egregious examples of abuse of power.
Bottom line: these incidents not only resulted in deaths but also eroded trust in our military.
6/ In 1967, the military was used in response to riots in Newark. 26 people were killed and hundreds injured, including 40 injured soldiers.
5/ In 1932, the Army was used to clear out a protest encampment of veterans seeking benefits. It ended in violence and damaged the reputation of the Army.
4/ Sending military personnel with combat equipment and heavy weapons into tense domestic situations rarely deescalates. We have often seen deadly consequences and the erosion of public trust.
3/ Our military is highly skilled, but receives very little training in law enforcement and domestic disturbance. Military forces are trained and organized for high-intensity combat operations.
2/ During my time in the military, I served in both National Guard and elite active-duty units (Rangers/paratroopers). I understand the training, authorities, and capabilities of military units.
1/ Why every American should be concerned with Trump’s use of the military in our communities🧵
As technology advances, we must do more to protect Americans' sensitive data.
That’s why I’m introducing bipartisan, bicameral legislation to strengthen our defenses and protect families from cyberattackers.
The recent attack in Boulder is horrifying.
I voted to condemn this violence and rise in antisemitism across America. The entire House joined together to speak in one unified voice. The vote was 400-0.
Nobody should have to live in fear because of their beliefs or who they are.
Meanwhile, DOD spends at least $40 million on Trump's vanity parade.
Disgraceful.
Under the U.S. Constitution, every person is entitled to due process and their day in court.
I’m a Democrat because we’re the party of the working class.
Americans don’t want government to fix all their problems for them.
They just want a fair shake and an opportunity to succeed.
The attack in Boulder is deeply disturbing.
We must call out antisemitism wherever we see it.
Right now, the gun industry is shielded from any liability for mass shootings.
That’s wrong.
I’m introducing new legislation to give victims of gun violence the ability to hold the gun industry accountable in court for negligent behavior.
First, they cut Medicaid.
Now, they want to cut Medicare.
The Republican agenda hurts seniors and working people.
As two billionaires have a messy public feud, remember this:
Republicans are hellbent on taking away health care & food assistance from working people to give a massive tax break to the wealthiest Americans.
Don't get distracted.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History552 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
552 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12