I guess maybe standards fell rapidly but I’d be more inclined to think OP is lying, or OP’s date was lying. When I was there there were certainly the occasional email going “you get a free dinner please we need volunteers” but never that
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1
Kevin Hern
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 551
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
??? Why do you think this
I think it’s a deliberate note from the RLHF. Someone wrote a style guide for ChatGPT basically
They also have an 80% chart at the same link!
The reason they had to “work alongside the Motor Insurer’s Bureau” and so why this is a news story about a crackdown rather than the status quo is that they’re gonna run aren’t allowed to access the DVLA database automatically
Yeah it’s why it’s one of the ones I closely track. They’re an independent outfit, running a battery of tests, that have an easy to grasp implication, and which is updated in real time. Main issue is that they’re gonna run out of test suite eventually which will break the time series
A fun thing about uninsured cars: I can, at any moment, type a number plate into my phone and find out if a car is uninsured. police cars can, at any moment, automatically use ANPR to check the number plate of the car in front of them. It is illegal to combine these two capabilities
much more aggressive use of ANPR is a big one. We have a database of uninsured number plates and it is illegal to hook it up to the cameras on police cars.
Friends car was just totalled by an uninsured banned driver _with a court date for driving offences tomorrow_. Three kids in her car when it happened, thankfully only one broken collarbone between them.
Don’t make me photoshop Florida into this
A couple of times I’ve had the pleasure of asking “are you saying the school week should be longer or that there are things that should be cut from the curriculum” and strangely no-one wants their name attached to either of THOSE proposals
Thing that's good about it is it's the same battery of tasks that they've been testing since Feb 2025. Agree that it's focused on SWE stuff
It's log scale, if that's what you mean
METR has updated its LLM time-horizon chart for Claude 4.5 Sonnet and we're still above the trendline. Slowdown? What slowdown? metr.org/blog/2025-03...
Although it doesn't exist as such in law, in practice a London council tenancy is an asset worth hundreds of thousands of pounds. Right to Buy is a process where you pay to swap that asset for the property itself.
If your social rent is £2,000 less than the house would rent for on the open market, then it's basically worth it _for the council_ if you exercise RtB and then sell it back to them for £270k, provided you then live for a little over a decade longer in a different house you own
The thing that always gets missed in RtB conversations though is that the person exercising RtB is also giving up a lifetime tenancy at vastly below-market-rate rent. Every chance that, for a house in central hackney, that asset is worth £270k!
Well that's where I wonder. What's the lifetime cost of a council tenant to the council? Presumably somewhere like hackney it could be approaching that level anyway
The other way of looking at this is that Hackney Council spent £269,950 to get someone to give up their council tenancy
In 2014, Hackney Council sold a property under Right to Buy for £95,050
In 2021, they bought it back off the ex-tenant for £365k
In ~6 yrs, the council lost £269,950 on a single property
It's not an isolated example. @bigissue.com has uncovered 100+ 'Yo-yo Homes'
www.bigissue.com/news/housing...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History551 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
551 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | NO | ✕ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.