Extended cameo of note on the season premiere of Hacks tonight!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8
Mark Harris
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 517
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align92%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 69 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
And don't even get me started on the whole growing "Uncle Jeff"/"Mister Jeff" thing.
Survivor 50 has finally broken me of my Covid-era renewed interest in the show. There's no real conflict, just endless jawing about gameplay, by and for people with an exhaustive recall of past seasons. The tribal councils have turned into long dull talk shows about how great Survivor is. I'm out.
Starting to think that pretty much any Democrat who promises not to post on social media more than once a week could get a solid 54% of the vote in 2028.
The curse of living in the U.S. is...well, you may have heard. Anyway, I'll bet that Oh, Mary! gets to Australia in the not-too-distant future.
NYC theater friends: Do not miss Becky Shaw. Scorching and screamingly funny writing about various toxic relationships, acted to the teeth by an impeccable quintet: Patrick Ball, Madeline Brewer, Alden Ehrenreich, Linda Emond, Lauren Patten. The most and hardest I have laughed since Oh, Mary!
Mild dissent: The older I get, the less I think Miranda is a monster. I don't think it's an accident that in what became the signature scene of the first movie--the sweater speech--she's right.
I'm so tired of the "THEN DO SOMETHING!" responses here. What Frost is saying is correct. He has very little power to do anything but say it. Would you rather he didn't say it at all?
I would like to believe that for Trump and his death cult of a party, threatening to annihilate a civilization is the equivalent of focus-group-testing an idea, and that they are aware of the negative results. Because as degraded a country as we are, that is literally the better alternative.
Hey, @bsky.app, you seem really broken right now. I mean literally broken, not just emotionally like all of us. What's up?
An important thread about a big story that the press is under-covering.
This is now on Netflix and if you haven't seen it, you're in for a treat.
Related: I am now in Year 16 of never quite remembering which Hemsworth that is. This movie has the Thor one.
Just watched Crime 101--a totally viable, more-than-acceptable Sunday night movie that is trapped in a slightly uncomfortable intermediate tonal place between Michael Mann existential-despair crime thriller and oddball Carl Hiassen everybody-has-a-quirk storytelling. Great cast, polished filmmaking.
Over the last decade, I got as tired as anyone of reading one post after another from people on Twitter and then on Bluesky shouting, "Don't normalize this!" about everything. But the people shouting it were right.
It's not primarily about profanity. It is the open contempt for an entire religion, the threat to send a population to hell, the uncertainty about whether he's the one even posting, the conducting of foreign policy via posts on a for-profit site. I think journalism is too numb to much of this.
This morning, he mocked the dominant religion of a region in which we presumably need allies, essentially using it as a sign-off for a promise of destruction and mayhem. I think that is an action at least as grave as his specific threat, and too many reporters just treat it as hot air.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History517 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
517 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11