Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 582
Yes75%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 74 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This is pretty mild stuff and yeah, it shouldn’t happen, but if you’re using it to make the case that New York is some kind of chaotic hell pit, don’t pretend you know the city or its people.
NO NEW YORK, NO NEW YORK, NO! Times Sq. shooting, 4 stabbings, 12 MTA buses vandalized, 5 World Cup shuttles torched after Knicks Finals win "Unnaceptable," NYNJ Host Committee sez "A few incidents" w/ "unacceptable" antics, per Mamdami NEW n @thecity.nyc www.thecityreporter.nyc/2026/06/14/k...
Also, if anyone out there sees em-dashes in my work and accuses me of using AI, I can promise them a tongue-lashing that nobody on earth will doubt was generated by a human being whose flaws go to his very core! I WILL make them cry, and then make them cry again hours later just from remembering.
Wait, em-dashes are now seen as an AI thing? I was using them before AI was a glimmer in Satan's eye and I'm not stopping now. I love them; they can represent a shift in tone, a raised eyebrow, a leaning-forward, a tiny jolt of midsentence caffeine. It was all I could do not to use one in this post.
About a half-dozen of the writers I work with have confessed to feeling paranoid about their use of em-dashes (the long ones: "—") because they fear people will believe their stuff was written by an AI. To which I say: Pfffft. Use as many dang dashes as you want. And let your human voice sing out.
The problem with Brandon Gill is not that he "seems like a closet case" or "protests too much." The problem with Brandon Gill is that he is a vicious bigot--the son-in-law of Dinesh D'Souza!--and as the youngest GOP rep, the embodiment of the morally vacant future of a rock-bottom political party.
REP. BRANDON GILL: This is a much more effeminate version of Beto O'Rourke ... this is somebody who is really obsessed with children ... I think of James Talarico as a barely straight version of Pete Buttigieg KAYLEIGH McENANY: We know Talarico has a longtime girlfriend and she's very beautiful
I'm halfway through the new Lord of the Flies on Netflix and genuinely not sure if Jack Thorne's subtle, thoughtful, humane approach to these boys is what William Golding's cruel, unsparing story needs. But it's beautifully made and acted, and feels blessedly free of notes from the algorithm.
Openness between spouses (which is a preexisting ethical promise) should be presumed--and people should not attempt to interpose themselves in that just because they want to confide something.
"Well, in that case I'm certainly not telling YOU any secrets." Folks, one day, if you're lucky, you will all reach an age at which not being in on everyone else's private business comes as sweet relief.
B. People do not have the right to assume you’ll keep something from your spouse—but they do have a right to assume you’ll hold your spouse to secrecy.
Help settle a 16 year discussion between me and my husband- if someone tells you something in confidence and asks you to tell no one does that mean: A- You’re not telling your spouse/partner B- You are telling your spouse/partner unless you’ve been specifically asked not to
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
582 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsNONOFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12