
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 8
Stephen F. Lynch
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes43%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Stephen F. Lynch
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 8
SoupScore
Stephen F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 156 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I am with my colleagues and union brothers and sisters to fight for Fair Trade for Working Families!
Join our livestream here - www.youtube.com/live/dJrhStw...
Please be advised that I will be hosting a Virtual Town Hall next Tuesday, May 19, starting at 6:30 p.m.
To sign up, please register here - tthm.com/RepLynch
In support of voting rights and election integrity, I introduced the Vote by Mail Protection Act to invalidate this unlawful and partisan executive order and prohibit the USPS and other federal agencies from using any taxpayer funds to restrict voting rights.
lynch.house.gov/2026/5/rep-s...
This week, we will again demand a vote on a War Powers Resolution to force President Trump to come to Congress to obtain authorization for the use of military force in Iran.
My office is accepting applications for my offices in Washington, D.C. and the District.
Visit my website to learn more and apply - lynch.house.gov/internships
I will continue to deny new funding for ICE until President Trump and the Congressional Republican Leadership agree to enact common sense reforms to ensure that the agency is fully transparent and accountable to the American people.
youtu.be/yPzw80Hu_TU
Electricity rates are soaring across the country and American families are paying far too much for their electricity.
That’s why I support the #EnergyBillsReliefAct to lower costs by expanding access to affordable & reliable clean energy.
My office is accepting submissions for the 2026 Congressional Art Competition!
Interested high school students in the Eighth Congressional District of Massachusetts should review the requirements and submit their artwork by April 24th.
Given that she has repeatedly given untruthful statements on the Epstein case and continually obstructed our investigation, she needs to comply with our bipartisan subpoena and testify under oath.
During her closed-door “briefing” to Oversight Committee Members, the Attorney General could not explain why her Justice Department has failed to pursue a case against Epstein’s co-conspirators.
Reposted byCongressman Stephen F. Lynch
“It’s because of the repeated lying that we’ve got to get her under oath...I do not believe she will tell the truth.” Rep. @lynch.house.gov on why the Oversight committee is seeking a sworn testimony from Pam Bondi on the Epstein files.
There has been no clear evidence from the intelligence community that Iran presented an imminent threat to the United States.
The Trump Administration is spending roughly $1 billion dollars a day in this conflict, funding which could have been used here at home.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12