Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 52
Juan Vargas
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes38%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 52
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Juan Vargas
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 52
SoupScore
Juan's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 92 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This is what's at stake.
Time for my Republican colleagues to choose. Are you on the side of the people? Are you on the side of families trying to afford their care?
Or will you continue to bow down to Trump, who's marching us closer to a shutdown?
I'm going to keep fighting to save health care.
Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House.
It's their basic responsibility to keep the government funded, and negotiate with Democrats if they need our votes.
But they would rather shutdown the government than work with us to protect health care for millions.
New, and a big deal: Based on updated data and changes made by the Trump administration, we now estimate that ACA enrollees would see their out-of-pocket premiums increase by 114% if enhanced premium tax credits are allowed to expire.
www.kff.org/affordable-c...
This is sickening. I absolutely condemn the horrific threats made against my colleague, Rep. @jayapal.house.gov.
The violent and hateful rhetoric must end. Political violence has no place in this country, and we all need to stand united in rejecting it.
Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House.
But they would rather shut down the government than work with Democrats to help millions of families afford their health care.
This is a reminder of what's at stake.
The Supreme Court greenlit racial profiling.
ICE should not be able to stop and interrogate you just because of the way you look or the language you speak.
It's an absolute outrage, and we're not going to stop sounding the alarm.
We are fighting to protect health care for families across the country.
Republicans are trying to slash health care and they're willing to shutdown the government over it.
Millions would lose coverage. Millions more would pay higher prices. That's what's at stake here.
An incredibly dangerous attack on the rule of law. Trump is trying to turn the Justice Department into a weapon for his own personal revenge, plain and simple. This is anti-democratic and anti-American, and we can't stay silent.
White House border czar Tom Homan reportedly accepted $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents as a bribe in exchange for influencing government contracts.
The Trump Admin ended the investigation.
Corruption, plain and simple. We need answers!
Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House. Keeping the government open is their most basic responsibility.
If they want to go it alone, that's their choice. But if they need our votes, they need to work in a bipartisan way.
This is not complicated.
Reposted byCongressman Juan Vargas
Go ahead and ask Americans if they can afford a 70% hike in their health insurance premiums right now. See how that goes.
It’s a crisis in the making that we’re TRYING to avoid, but Trump is refusing to meet with us.
Sending warm wishes to everyone celebrating Rosh Hashanah here in CA-52 and across the country. May your new year be filled with health and happiness.
Shana Tova!
Families deserve better. I voted no alongside my House Dem colleagues. I'm not going rubberstamp anything that worsens the health care crisis Trump and Republicans are creating.
After making the largest cuts to Medicaid in history this summer, they're now letting ACA credits expire. Millions will lose their health care and see their premiums skyrocket without action.
Today, House Republicans jammed through a partisan spending bill that escalates their attacks on affordable health care.
What the FCC and Trump are doing here is straight out of an authoritarian playbook.
They're very clearly using government powers to silence protected speech. That's state censorship.
Everyone who cares about free speech should be sounding the alarm.
I'm leading 65+ House Democrats in calling on DHS for answers on the use of racial profiling in immigration enforcement.
We need accountability.
A federal judge found that Trump's ICE agents have been targeting people based on whether they a) look Latino; b) speak Spanish; and c) are at a certain location, like a day laborer pickup site.
That's racial profiling. Worse, the Supreme Court just greenlit these practices in a recent decision.
Reposted byCongressman Juan Vargas
LIVE: I'm holding a Shadow Hearing on Trump's assault on families and communities through his unconstitutional and cruel immigration policies, kidnappings, and deportations. Tune in now:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=m47G...
"The end goal here is clear. President Trump is attempting to take over the Fed... He wants control of the Fed in order to bail out his failing economic agenda."
I'm sounding the alarm on Trump's dangerous and unprecedented attacks on the Federal Reserve's independence. Watch here ⬇️
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 10 / 10