Wishing every Texan a safe and happy New Year’s Eve!
I'm proud of our state's resilience in a tough year, and I'm ready to keep fighting for working families in the year ahead. 💪🏽
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 35
Greg Casar
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 498
Yes30%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting19%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 35
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Greg Casar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 35
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 6 sponsored · 123 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Millions of kids are going to lose health care so that billionaires like Trump’s Secretary of Education will get a tax cut.
So I asked her to explain how that is ok.
Trump is afraid of being held accountable by voters in 2026. He’s so afraid, he's willing to rig the maps and cheat the system.
Texans deserve fair maps and real representation.
Social Security is a promise earned over a lifetime of work.
Any politician who treats it like a bargaining chip or a business opportunity is betraying working people.
A Tesla worker in my district was electrocuted because the company cut corners. OSHA’s fine was just $50,000.
Elon Musk makes that back in nine minutes from federal contracts alone.
A worker’s life is worth more than a rounding error to a billionaire.
Working people deserve a government that works for them – not one captured by billionaires and corporate lobbyists.
Congress needs to tax the rich and hold Trump accountable for his corruption.
Austin’s airport is critical to Central Texas’ economy and I was proud to fight for this federal funding.
It's a win for our community that will result in better infrastructure, good jobs, and easier, safer travel for all Texans.
Release the Epstein files.
If Trump is allowed to take bargaining rights away from federal workers, he will come for yours next.
I’m fighting back.
No war with Venezuela.
No one should go without health care.
Period.
Here are two numbers you need to know.
15 million: the number of people Republicans want to kick off health care.
20 million: the number of people Republicans want to double health premiums for.
Trump’s immigration czar Tom Homan was caught taking a $50,000 cash bribe and the Trump administration covered it up.
Reposted byCongressman Greg Casar
We send our solidarity and sympathy to Australia’s Jewish community after this horrific mass shooting against Hanukkah celebrators. We are more determined than ever to fight and defeat antisemitism worldwife. Our deepest condolences go to the victims and their families.
What Donald Trump has tried to do to the Social Security administration is a scandal.
Because Republicans are doubling health insurance prices, people in my district will have to choose between groceries and insurance.
For far too many Americans, the cost of rent makes it impossible to get ahead, and the idea of owning a home is out of reach.
We’ve made it too hard to build housing in America.
We’ve invested too little in housing.
And we've let hedge funds & big corporations buy up too much and jack up rents.
No one in America should have their family threatened for using their First Amendment rights.
I’m demanding that Any Lopez be returned home, and that the Trump Administration stop this retaliation immediately. (2/2)
I’ve seen the Trump Administration do many terrible things, but this one is a first.
They wrongfully deported a 19-year-old Austin constituent in shackles. When she spoke out, armed ICE agents were sent in an unmarked van to threaten her parents. (1/2)
youtube.com/shorts/mgYyo...
The Trump Administration is threatening a wrongfully deported student’s family because she spoke out about her mistreatment.
Everyone in this country has a First Amendment right to criticize their government.
This should send a chill down your spine.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History498 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
498 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 10 / 10