Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 535
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Actually the writing is one only thing giving me pause - the sentence “it seemed amazing at first fast answers, detailed explanations…” is missing a punctuation mark.
I’m pretty confident in calling this fake. The user who posted it seems to be part of a substantial network of accounts with similar usernames all posting and commenting on each other’s content. Ironically it’s a great example of an AI agent making stuff up to tell you what you want to hear
the guy saying that AI destroying software engineering means it will shortly destroy all knowledge work is overextrapolating from his own career and not acknowledging the specific features of coding that made it amenable to this he's also not really wrong about his own career though
He lives in an information environment where if you go to tower hamlets you will not meet a single person who is British, and where even small rural villages are being overwhelmed by asylum seekers in local hotels, with councils giving them free houses
I think if you spell out the implications of his belief - that one in five people in the UK have arrived in the last five years - he would have said “yes, that sounds right.”
Something that feels important about the Ratcliffe comments is they aren’t simply innumeracy. Everyone has problems with this sort of thing at times, because we have no intuitive feel for the difference between very large numbers. But this seems distinct
Yeah I’m slightly hmmmmm about an excuse that lines up with pre-existing practices and doesn’t really make that much sense. Would be curious if the books are printed in the US for one
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
535 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionNONOFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 11Next →