This weekend, I got to talk to high schoolers across Illinois at the Latin School’s Model UN Conference! I’m always so impressed by our next generation of leaders — our future is in good hands.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 5
Mike Quigley
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes42%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Quigley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 5
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 142 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump has also removed references to slavery in our national parks. This erasure doesn’t help anyone — it only emboldens discrimination. Join me in telling the president #handsoff our history!
Since the beginning of Trump 2.0, ONE-THIRD of all museums have lost funding. This includes the DuSable Black History Museum in Chicago.
More below.
Our crime reduction and public safety programs keep us safe — not violent, masked thugs targeting innocents.
While Trump claims federal agents are needed in Chicago to fight crime, our crime rates have been declining for years — thanks to early interventions, gun violence prevention programs, and funding for local law enforcement.
From Barilla to De Cecco, your favorite pastas could soon disappear because of Trump's tariffs.
We need this #tariffchaos to end and our grocery prices to drop!
This week, the Illinois Delegation led over 150 House and Senate Democrats in filing an amicus brief to the Supreme Court to stop Trump’s deployment of the National Guard.
There is no reason the U.S. military should be used on Americans. We’re not going to let him turn Chicago into a warzone.
This bill will make Chicagoans safer by making ICE and CBP agents follow heightened DOJ standards on the use of force. It will also restrict the use of tear gas, require body cameras, and limit the use of masks.
Pepper-spraying babies, abducting citizens, making warrantless arrests – federal agents in Chicago are out of control. I’m supporting the Stop Excessive Force Act to stop the madness. (more below!)
The Trump administration is denying Ukrainian nationals their lawful right to a credible-fear screening before deporting them to an active war zone. Our laws require due process and a review of potential harm — this administration must stop ignoring these basic legal obligations.
The Protect Sensitive Locations Act will stop ICE and CBP from entering daycares, schools, hospitals, and churches.
We will NOT live in fear.
I enjoyed spending time with folks from the Ravenswood Fellowship @umnews.bsky.social at their annual pancake breakfast recently!🥞🍴
During this time of adversity for many Chicagoans, it’s more important than ever before to come together as a community.
On Friday, Katie's kids and many others had to enter a lockdown because of ICE raids. Read her story on the #ICEeffect on children. (🧵)
#ice #chicago
A federal judge just ordered the Trump administration to release over 600 people they abducted in Chicago. ICE officials are also forbidden from pressuring people to agree to be deported.
This is what happens when we stick together and speak out. Keep up the pressure!
Speaker Pelosi's career is a masterclass in leadership. Read my statement on her retirement here.
Reposted byMike Quigley
Today marks the beginning of #TransAwarenessWeek!
To trans Americans everywhere: we see you, and we're fighting for you every day from the halls of Congress to protect your rights from Trump & the GOP's attacks.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.